When the solar-panel company Solyndra went bankrupt last fall, the issue quickly became political. The Obama administration had been a major investor in the company, and many Republicans wasted no time in criticizing the handling of clean-energy loans. Since then the Department of Energy has failed to make any other loans.
The New York Times reports that although $25 billion in loans were authorized five years ago by Congress to develop fuel-efficient vehicles, only $8.4 billion has been authorized. In the last two years, only one small project of $50 million has gained approval.
This isn't good news for the green energy companies that had applications for money with the department.
"A senior advisor to Mr. Chu [United States Secretary of Energy], Richard L. Kauffman, acknowledged that some applicants had lost patience with the government's scrutiny of their finances and business plans."
Indeed, the Energy Department's fear of dealing with "another Solyndra situation" has been a devastating disappointment for fuel-efficient auto developers. Many, on the realization that the money may never come, have closed up shop.
Here are some of the impacts as reported by the New York Times:
- Carbon Motors, dropped its $310 million application on Wednesday. The money would have been used to build police cars with diesel engines that use 40% less fuel than current models.
- "Fisker Automotive stopped construction in February at a Delaware plant it bought from General Motors after the Energy Department blocked the company from using a portion of its $529 million loan."
- "Bright Automotive, a start-up in Michigan that withdrew its application last month. It is shutting down operations to produce a plug-in hybrid delivery van after energy officials suddenly demanded the company raise $345 million in private funds for a project that needed a $314 million loan."
- "Bright has not been explicitly rejected by the D.O.E.," the company's management said in a Feb. 28 letter to Mr. Chu, the energy secretary. "Rather, we have been forced to say 'uncle."
- "Last month, Chrysler withdrew its application for $3.5 billion in loans after three years of negotiations -- because the government kept raising the amount of collateral required, company officials said."
Business section: Investing ideas
This is unfortunate news for the development of clean energy technology, but not all clean energy companies are falling victim to the Department of Energy.
To find names expected to buck the trend, we ran a universe of clean-energy stocks through a screen to find those with the most insider significant levels of institutional buying in the current quarter.
The "smart money" investors are bullish on these names. Do you agree with their optimism? (Click here to access free, interactive tools to analyze these ideas.)
1. Ameresco: Provides energy efficiency solutions for facilities in North America. Net institutional purchases in the current quarter at 698.7K shares, which represents about 4.3% of the company's float of 16.24M shares
2. Ashland: Operates as a specialty chemicals company in the United States and internationally. Net institutional purchases in the current quarter at 3.9M shares, which represents about 5.36% of the company's float of 72.73M shares
3. Clean Energy Fuels
4. Energy Recovery
5. Green Plains Renewable Energy
7. Tesla Motors
8. WCA Waste: Provides non-hazardous solid waste collection, transfer, processing, and disposal services in the United States. Net institutional purchases in the current quarter at 4.3M shares, which represents about 30.74% of the company's float of 13.99M shares.
Interactive Chart: Press Play to compare changes in analyst ratings over the last two years for the stocks mentioned above. Analyst ratings sourced from Zacks Investment Research.
Kapitall's Rebecca Lipman does not own any of the shares mentioned above. Institutional data sourced from Fidelity.
The Motley Fool owns shares of Power-One. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Ameresco and Tesla Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.