Numbers can lie -- yet they're the best first step in determining whether a stock is a buy. In this series, we use some carefully chosen metrics to size up a stock's true value based on the following clues:
- The current price multiples.
- The consistency of past earnings and cash flow.
- How much growth we can expect.
Let's see what those numbers can tell us about how expensive or cheap Quiksilver
The current price multiples
First, we'll look at most investors' favorite metric: the P/E ratio. It divides the company's share price by its earnings per share (EPS) -- the lower, the better.
Then we'll take things up a notch with a more advanced metric: enterprise value to unlevered free cash flow, which divides the company's enterprise value (basically, its market cap plus its debt, minus its cash) by its unlevered free cash flow (its free cash flow, adding back the interest payments on its debt). As with the P/E, the lower this number is, the better.
Analysts argue about which is more important -- earnings or cash flow. Who cares? A good buy ideally has low multiples on both.
Quiksilver has a negative P/E ratio and a negative EV/FCF ratioover the trailing 12 months. If we stretch and compare current valuations with the five-year averages for earnings and free cash flow, we see that we see that Quiksilver still has a negative P/E ratio and a five-year EV/FCF ratio of 13.5.
A positive one-year ratio of less than 10 for both metrics is ideal (at least in my opinion). For a five-year metric, less than 20 is ideal.
Quiksilver has a mixed performance in hitting the ideal targets, but let's see how it stacks up against some of its competitors and industry mates.
Source: S&P Capital IQ; NM = not meaningful because of losses.
Numerically, we've seen how Quiksilver's valuation rates on both an absolute and relative basis. Next, let's examine ...
The consistency of past earnings and cash flow
An ideal company will be consistently strong in its earnings and cash-flow generation.
In the past five years, Quiksilver's net income margin has ranged from -18% to -0.2%. In that same time frame, unlevered free cash flow margin has ranged from -3.4% to 13.4%.
How do those figures compare with those of the company's peers? See for yourself:
Source: S&P Capital IQ; margin ranges are combined.
In addition, over the past five years, Quiksilver has tallied up no years of positive earnings and three years of positive free cash flow.
Next, let's figure out ...
How much growth we can expect
Analysts tend to comically overstate their five-year growth estimates. If you accept them at face value, you will overpay for stocks. But even though you should definitely take the analysts' prognostications with a grain of salt, they can still provide a useful starting point when compared with similar numbers from a company's closest rivals.
Let's start by seeing what this company's done over the past five years. Because of losses, Quiksilver's trailing growth rate isn't meaningful. But here's how its peers did:
Source: S&P Capital IQ; EPS growth shown.
And here's how it measures up with regard to the growth analysts expect over the next five years:
Source: S&P Capital IQ; estimates for EPS growth.
The bottom line
The pile of numbers we've plowed through has shown us the price multiples that shares of Quiksilver are trading at, the volatility of its operational performance, and what kind of growth profile it has -- both on an absolute and a relative basis.
The more consistent a company's performance has been and the more growth we can expect, the more we should be willing to pay. We've gone well beyond looking at a negative P/E ratio, and we see that each of its price multiples is negative except for a five-year EV/FCF multiple of 13.5. That said, it's certainly a red flag that Quiksilver hasn't been earnings-profitable in any year of the past five.
As another data point, our CAPS community rates Quiksilver two stars (out of five). But all this is just a start. If you find Quiksilver's numbers or story compelling, don't stop here. Continue your due-diligence process until you're confident one way or the other. As a start, add it to My Watchlist to find all of our Foolish analysis.
In our brand-new free report, "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying," I wrote about a stock that's flying under the radar. I invite you to take a free copy to find out the name of the company I believe Warren Buffett would be interested in if he could still invest in small companies.
Anand Chokkavelu holds no position in any company mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Under Armour. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Under Armour and Nike and creating a diagonal call position in Nike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.