The Washington Post
No one reads this rag
The worst news to come out of the company's filing is its horrific subscription data. The company's namesake newspaper segment lost $23 million in the quarter. This was due largely to falling ad revenue; online advertising fell 7% due to decreases in all areas of the company's online world.
Abysmal subscriber numbers made the fall in revenue possible. The company hasn't jumped into the world of online subscriptions and has suffered for it. Weekly subscriptions dropped 10%, with Sunday subscriptions falling 5%. On the plus side, newsprint costs dropped 11%, because no one is buying the paper anymore.
Companies getting it right
The New York Times'
If the Post wants to learn something from this experience, it can take a page from Gannett
Overpriced for under-delivery
To top it all off, the Post is trading at 18 times forward earnings. The Times and Gannet -- both of which have digital growth supporting them -- are only trading at nine and six times earnings, respectively. For what the Post is promising, it seems exceptionally overvalued.
Right now, The Washington Post is in a bad place. Even though Warren Buffett seems to like it, I'm not comfortable sinking money into a company that hasn't provided stockholders with a clear path to prosperity. If it can put a subscription model in place and ensure that the model adds value to consumers, then I think the Post could be a great place to invest. For now, I'm holding off.
While the Post is a rare example of Buffett getting it wrong, there are great examples of him getting it right. I mean, he's pretty good at this whole investing thing. Check out the Fool's free report, "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying." It covers some of Buffett's more prescient picks, and one stock that he only wishes he could buy. Get your free copy here.