You'll recall the same publication said Bristol-Myers Squibb
Amylin has been looking for an ex-U.S. partner for its diabetes drugs since Eli Lilly
I think you have to assume at this point that Amylin's bankers are releasing this info with the blessing of the biotech. It's possible there are multiple "people familiar with the matter" that get their kicks being unnamed sources, but I'm inclined to believe that Amylin wants the information out there to help fuel the bidding war.
Is Amylin worth buying at this point? I think you have to make a lot of assumptions to buy here:
- Bloomberg is right. I think that's a reasonable assumption. There are three authors on the article; I'm willing to bet they went the extra mile to authenticate what the sources were saying as best they could.
- The companies will bid. Signing a confidentiality agreement doesn't mean they'll put in a bid. The companies could be trying to get a leg up on an ex-U.S. partnership, but not be interested in the entire company.
- A suitor is willing to pay more than the current value. This is the hardest of the three to accept. Bydureon hasn't been on the market for long enough to get a good sense of its potential. If a suitor does top the current market price, I wouldn't expect much of a premium; Amylin is up 140% this year.
The jump today is justified because the news brings some clarity to Amylin's plan. But there's still a real risk that no buyer will appear and shares will retreat substantially, making it inappropriate for all but the most risk-tolerant investors.
David Gardner and his team at Rule Breakers aren't counting on an acquisition to get solid returns from one of their recent health-care picks. Find out which stock it is and why they like it in the Fool's free report "Discover the Next Rule-Breaking Multibagger."