Stop me if you've heard this one.
Thousands of largely novice investors line up for what's been billed as "the opportunity of a lifetime" to buy a "can't-miss" investment destined for easy gains. Pundits take position and say it's worth buying at "any price." People whisper in anticipation over how much they'll make. Fifty percent? Double their money? More?
In the end, the floor drops out and they're left with hefty losses -- totally predictable losses. Furious investors want answers. What went wrong, they ask? The answer is usually complicated, but has a common denominator: You overpaid. Fell for the hype. Gambled and lost. It happens.
This could explain the dot-com bubble or the housing collapse. But it also sums up what's happened to Facebook
By Tuesday afternoon -- two trading days into life as a public company -- Facebook shares were down more than 30% from their Friday high.
Investor complaints weren't far behind. They sued Facebook. They sued Nasdaq. They sued Morgan Stanley
Some of the outrage might be justified. There are legitimate claims that bankers withheld information from some customers, and that Nasdaq botched trade executions. One Nasdaq official admitted that, in hindsight, the IPO should have been delayed.
But what really led to investor losses isn't a conspiracy. Every investor has heard that you need to be "fearful when others are greedy," yet look at what happened on Friday. At an IPO price of $38 a share, Facebook traded at around 100 times earnings and 25 times revenue -- something straight out of 1999. The offering was oversubscribed 25 times over in Asia alone. Facebook increased the number of shares to be sold by 25%. Several company insiders more than doubled the amount of stock they originally planned on offering for sale. All of that was public information known before the IPO.
Investors didn't seem to care. They had easy money on their minds. And the fact that investors stomped their feet over losses a few hours after the company began trading tells you something about them: They aren't really investors. They're short-term speculators. Really short-term speculators.
You have no one to blame but yourself, folks. As Reuters blogger Felix Salmon put it:
Finally, there are all the investors ... who bought into the IPO even though they knew that the valuation was incredibly high, and are now casting around for someone else to blame for their losses. It's impossible to feel any sympathy for these people -- especially institutions who had no appetite for stock at more than $32 per share, but put in large orders at $38 anyway just because they were counting on Morgan Stanley to give them a nice opening-day pop. If you pay 100X earnings for a hyped Internet stock on its first day of trading and then you lose money, you frankly had it coming.
Or as Jonathan Weil of Bloomberg wrote: "Nobody forced anyone to buy Facebook shares. Blaming the company's underwriters for the stock's plunge is like losing money at a casino and then waiting until afterward to complain about the house's odds."
So, what are the lessons here?
A satirical Twitter account for Goldman Sachs
Wall Street doesn't have small investors' best interest at heart. That should be excruciatingly clear after all these years. Most companies don't go public because they want to let you in on the action. They do so to let insiders cash out richly priced shares onto unsuspecting gulls. You're only a victim of that as much as you're willing to let yourself be.
Second, this should be a reminder that there's a difference between a great company and a great investment. Facebook is an amazing company. Users, revenue, and earnings will probably grow like weeds for several years. But that doesn't mean it's worth $100 billon. It might not even be worth $50 billion. Any investment can be a steal at one price and a rip-off at another. I've shown several high-quality companies, including Google
Here's what's sad: Some say Facebook's IPO flop will make it harder for other companies to go public in the future, since investors will be more wary. I don't buy that. A few months from now people will forget about this -- just like they forgot about the dot-com bust and the housing bubble -- and we'll be right here again, watching investors lick their wounds after learning the dear consequences of running with the crowd.Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Wal-Mart. Follow him on Twitter @TMFHousel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of The Goldman Sachs Group and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a diagonal call position in Wal-Mart Stores. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.
More from The Motley Fool
Why Shares of Facebook, Inc. Were Up 53% in 2017
The company was firing on all cylinders, and investors took notice.
It's Official: Facebook Messenger Has Become "Too Cluttered"
The social network vows to simplify one of its most popular messaging services in 2018.
Facebook's Major News Feed Revamp Could Exacerbate Fake News
The social network might actually be making things worse.