Does this sound familiar? Jobs growth looks strong early in the year, only to peter out around springtime, leading to fears of a new recession.
It should. It describes what happened in 2010, 2011, and now again this year.
The economy added 69,000 jobs in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on Friday. Though these reports are noisy and prone to revisions, this was anything but good news. The Dow
The best way to get a feel for our jobs situation is to focus on the trend. Averaging the most recent six months together, the trend in job creation doesn't look so bad, despite last month's disappointment:
Indeed, the current six-month average -- 175,000 jobs a month -- is nearly identical to growth seen in 2005 and 2006, when the economy was booming. Today's figures look even better if you focus on the private sector. Government employment has contracted by an average of 14,000 jobs a month over the last year, compared with growth of 12,000 a month from 2000-2006. Recent private-sector employment growth has been some of the strongest in more than a decade.
But that positive spin masks a bitter reality: Employment fell so ferociously in 2008 and 2009 that even decent rates of growth today aren't enough to make a difference. If the economy continues to add an average of 175,000 jobs a month going forward, the unemployment rate would not fall below 6% until 2021. We will almost certainly endure more recessions between now and then, so the trajectory is likely even worse than that.
The unemployment rate ticked up a tenth of a percent last month, to 8.2%. Most of the rise was due to an increase in the size of the labor force, which jumped by a whopping 642,000. That's actually a rare bit of good news -- an indication that those once discouraged from even looking for a job are tiptoeing back in. Last week, the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Confidence report showed (link opens PDF) that "the fewest consumers reported hearing of job losses in May than any time since mid-2007." All the while, a broader unemployment rate that includes discouraged workers and those working part time involuntarily rose to 14.8%, from 14.5%. Any way it's sliced, too many people are staring down too few jobs.
A few other bits from recent employment reports:
Bad news: Most jobs created this year have been in temporary or low-pay work. Manufacturing and construction jobs have risen only modestly, while fields like temporary help and food services have done well.
Good news: Excluding temporary hiring for the 2010 census, this was the strongest May jobs report in five years, and the fourth best in the last decade (although that highlights how poor a decade it's been for employment).
Bad news: Average hourly earnings have increased just 1.7% in the last year, below the rate of inflation. The average number of hours worked has ticked down this year, and sits flat from a year ago at 34.4 hours per week.
Good news in context: As my colleague Matt Koppenheffer points out, the year-over-year change in total employment for the last three years shows decisive progress:
- 2009: -5.6 million.
- 2010: -945,000.
- 2011: +468,000.
- 2012: +2.5 million.
Bad news: March and April's initial job reports were revised down by a combined 49,000.
Statistically weird news: Women captured 138% of the jobs growth last month, as male employment fell.
Important news: The unemployment rate for those with a bachelor's degree is 3.9% -- less than a percentage point higher than it was a decade ago. For those with a high school diploma, it's 8.1%, or 2.5 percentage points higher than a decade ago. For those without a high school diploma, the unemployment rate is 13%, or nearly 5 percentage points higher than a decade ago. The disparity between the college-educated and everyone else has never been so great.
The last two spring slowdowns eventually blew over, with employment and stocks bouncing back later in the year. Will the same trend repeat this time, or are we now in the midst of a lasting slowdown? No one knows. What we do know is that it's bad now, and unless things get considerably better very quickly, millions face the prospect of being stuck in a generation of joblessness. There's never a good time to panic, but that should make everyone nervous.
Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Follow him on Twitter @TMFHousel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.
More from The Motley Fool
Does a Strong Start Make 2018 a Sure Winner for Stocks?
Find out whether the so-called "January effect" is real.
Meet the 2018 Dogs of the Dow
Learn the basics of this simple dividend-investing strategy.
The Dow's Worst Day in 2017
Even with big gains, there were some scary times for the average.