Investing isn't easy. Even Warren Buffett counsels that most investors should invest in a low-cost index like the S&P 500. That way, "you'll be buying into a wonderful industry, which in effect is all of American industry," he says.
But there are, of course, companies whose long-term fortunes differ substantially from the index. In this series, we look at how members of the S&P 500 have performed compared with the index itself.
Step on up, Pepsi
Pepsi shares have crushed the S&P 500 over the last three decades:
Source: S&P Capital IQ.
Since 1980, shares returned an average of 15.6% a year, compared with 11.1% a year for the S&P (both include dividends). That difference adds up fast. A thousand dollars invested in the S&P in 1980 would be worth $29,400 today. In Pepsi, it would be worth $103,000.
Dividends accounted for a lot of that gain. Compounded since 1980, dividends have made up 53.1% of Pepsi's total returns. For the S&P, dividends account for 41.5% of total returns.
Now have a look at how Pepsi's earnings compare with S&P 500 earnings:
Source: S&P Capital IQ.
Again, we see significant outperformance. Since 1995, Pepsi's earnings per share have grown by an average of 9.8% a year, compared with 6% a year for the broader index. That's testament to the power of the company's brand, significant international growth, and a history of strong capital allocation.
That earnings growth dynamic has led to premium valuations. Pepsi has traded for an average of 25.8 times earnings since 1980, compared with 21.3 times for the S&P.
The company has been, without a doubt, an above-average performer historically.
The question is whether that can continue. That's where you come in. Our CAPS community currently ranks Pepsi with a five-star rating (out of five). Do you disagree? Leave your thoughts in the comment section below or add Pepsi to My Watchlist.
