At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.
How long will Embraer remain grounded?
The month of August is looking more like the month of "arrrgh and disgust" to shareholders of Embraer
Analysts at UBS think so. In a note related on StreetInsider.com yesterday, UBS said that current share prices seem to assume continued earnings declines at Embraer. However, the analyst argues that, to the contrary, even if you assume "much lower regional jet production," Embraer still has every chance of turning in "double-digit EPS growth over the coming years," alongside strong cash generation "driven by higher customer deposits and lower cash R&D spend." Indeed, the consensus on Wall Street is that Embraer investors can expect to see 18% annualized profits growth over the next five years.
Embraer seems to agree. At the same time as it fessed up to the earnings decline, management promised to maintain production levels and improve profit margins as the year progresses.
"Hey, it's an improvement!"
In one respect at least, Embraer is outperforming rivals such as Boeing
So that's a factor in Embraer's favor. Unfortunately, the numbers suggest it's still not enough to justify UBS' advice to buy the stock. Profitable on a cash basis Embraer may be, but it's generating so little cash that the company's price-to-free cash flow ratio is still a rather pricey 31.2.
Three strikes is all you get
So to sum up: Lacking profits, the stock has no P/E to value it on. Free cash flow, while present, isn't robust enough to justify the stock price. What about price-to-sales, perhaps? Could this metric give us an excuse to follow UBS' advice and buy Embraer?
Unfortunately not, because here, once again, Embraer fails the valuation test. At a price-to-sales ratio of 0.84, Embraer doesn't look expensive in isolation, but relative to the other options available to aerospace investors, it's still pricier than the alternatives. From top to bottom, we find Lockheed trading at 0.6 times sales, Northrop Grumman at 0.64, and Boeing at 0.71 -- in all three cases, cheaper than Embraer.
Long story short, I see little reason to go long Embraer at today's prices. The shares may be down 3% over the past year, but they're still not cheap enough to buy. (But we've found one defense stock that might be. Check out our new report, "Stocks That Could Skyrocket After the 2012 Presidential Election," and we'll tell you all about it.)
Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 306 out of more than 180,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Goldman Sachs and Embraer.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.