Poor Idenix Pharmaceuticals
Being a next-generation drug, IDX19368 is further behind in the develop process. In fact, IDX19368 hasn't even been tested in humans.
Idenix isn't particularly less valuable if IDX19368 can't be developed; most of its potential is wrapped up in IDX184. But putting another drug on clinical hold is a further sign at how serious the FDA is taking BMS-986094's side effect issues. IDX184 and IDX19368 are both related to BMS-986094, which Bristol-Myers Squibb
The biotech thinks its drugs are different enough from BMS-986094 that they shouldn't have the same side-effect profile. But the only way to definitively prove that is by testing the drug in humans. For now, the FDA won't let Idenix do that directly -- thus the clinical hold -- so the company will have to use preclinical laboratory experiments to explain why BMS-986094 causes side effects and then prove its drugs won't have the same problem.
Interestingly, Bristol has offered its help in determining what's wrong with BMS-986094, which might make things a little easier, but investors shouldn't expect this to be a cakewalk.
If Idenix is able to emerge on the other side of the clinical-hold black hole, maybe Bristol would be interested in partnering with Idenix. Gilead Sciences
Ah, the joy of drug development.
You can partially offset the waves of drug development with dividend paying stocks. Check out the Fool's new free report "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks," where you'll find one drug developer and eight other promising companies. Get your free copy.