Super-sized mergers and acquisitions hold a lot of water for companies and their investors. Though history shows most companies overpay for their big purchases, the moves can also lead to increased economies of scale, supreme market position, and improved efficiencies once overlaps are removed. Yesterday, two of the biggest aerospace and defense companies in Europe announced talks of a merger. The move could put the European defense industry, and the American one as well, on its toes.
When we get on a plane these days, chances are it's made by the duopoly that runs commercial jet production -- Boeing
The move is very similar to Boeing's acquisition of McDonnell Douglas a few years back. Boeing was looking to increase its exposure to military and defense sectors due to the volatile nature of the passenger plane business. While then the United States and other western nations were only increasing defense budgets, especially after 9/11, now the story is reversed. Shrinking defense budgets around the globe have many of the defense contractors seeking alternative forms of revenue. This gives EADS an opportunity to snap up BAE for what is likely a lower price than what it could fetch in military boom times.
The merger would create an absolute monster of a company, and one that Boeing and other defense companies, such as Lockheed Martin
It would be a massive restructuring that would take years to fully implement -- making the true value of the merger a difficult one to pin down any time soon. But, on the surface, it looks like the resulting company would be the biggest, most well positioned aerospace and defense company on the planet.
The ownership structures create complications as well. France, Spain, and German conglomerate Daimler own substantial portions of each company, making a merger difficult to process. The United States has already weighed in on the subject, saying it would not stand in the way of a merger even though BAE's military electronics segment, Sanders, was originally a Lockheed division and could be subject to trade regulations.
Defense contracting is all about the sell. Sure, technology wavers from company to company, and each organization has its own advantages and disadvantages. But, for the big sources of revenue (i.e. governments), it's about who has the best lobbying power and who can undercut the other one at the last second.
Boeing and EADS are pros at this game in the U.S. market. The two have battled incessantly for government contracts, with Lockheed Martin and other contractors in the mix as well. A combination of EADS and BAE, though, would create a company with immense bargaining power, and could be serious threat to Boeing's future contracts.
Investors say "eh"
Learning from history, investors are often weary of major deal-making from big companies. Today, both BAE and EADS are plunging in stock price, as investors just don't seem too turned on by the prospect of the deal. Will it be enough to crush the merger -- who knows? If the management teams are strong enough in their belief that the merger would enhance value, they may go ahead with the deal, barring any shareholder activism. But, with all the expense associated with the deal, and with BAE and EADS trading down nearly 9% and 14%, respectively, this merger may die before it ever gets going.
The deal would be revolutionary for the defense market, if it goes through. On that note, if you're looking for an investing angle on a revolutionary product, take action now and download our recent free report that provides insight into the trillion-dollar mobile revolution. It's only available for a limited time, so click here now.
Fool contributor Michael Lewis owns none of the stocks mentioned above. You can follow him on Twitter @MikeyLewy. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.