How much would you pay to learn how much your coworkers make? How much would you pay for a product that reveals the salary of peers in your industry as well as the salary levels at your prospective employers? Perhaps the question is: How much wouldn't you pay?
Unless you're actively searching for a job, why subscribe? At $19.99 a month for the base business subscription, a LinkedIn membership is more expensive but less fun than a membership with, say, Spotify, Hulu Plus, or beleaguered old Netflix
Imagine LinkedIn Prime
But a product that helps professionals to manage their careers could be seriously compelling. Imagine a membership that gave you access to compensation and benefits information at your current employer, at prospective employers and across your industry. You'd be better equipped when negotiating for raises and promotions, and in making the crucial decision to stay or move on. You'd be pulling out your credit card right now.
LinkedIn, surely, is in no hurry to alienate its important corporate customers by leveling the information gap between employers and workers by providing this unprecedented workplace transparency. With its Silicon Valley roots, the company is likely far more familiar with an environment in which top executive talent is in demand and firms are in an arms race to acquire certain technical skill sets. In such an environment, LinkedIn's essentially business-to-business product offerings are highly valuable.
Outside of Silicon Valley and the nation's other choice zip codes, it's the other way 'round. Workers compete for employment, and there's the opportunity to sell these workers an edge. In this intensely competitive landscape, such a product might be purchased by nearly every career-savvy, over-one's-shoulder-looking, peer-envying, information-craving, angsty professional. You, and everyone you know who hasn't yet retired. Call it LinkedIn Prime. Of course, part of the cost of joining would be disclosing your own salary information. The people unwilling to do so probably aren't the target market for the product, anyway. It would be self-selecting.
A precedent in "Zestimates"
The precedence for LinkedIn to bear in mind may actually be Zillow
It's a win-win for house shoppers and sellers -- and an example that LinkedIn could follow.
Sizing up the market and potential revenue
How big, exactly, would the market for LinkedIn Prime be? Across the globe, there are almost 650 million professionals. More than 175 million currently have profiles on LinkedIn; two more sign up every second of every day. If just 10% of this base of 175 million subscribed to LinkedIn prime, paying $199 a year, LinkedIn would see revenue of $4 billion in the first year, or more than five times its revenue from the last 12 months. The total worth of the market, in the extra-unreal scenario in which every professional the world over subscribed, would be worth nearly $130 billion a year. In this scenario, LinkedIn would overshadow even Google
Engagement, a crucial metric for LinkedIn, could shoot through the roof and out to space. LinkedIn is the 26th most visited website in the world today, with 10 billion unique page views in its second quarter. Offering LinkedIn Prime, that figure could easily double or triple as professionals click through highly relevant information across their networks.
Possible acquisitions and competitors
Glassdoor.com currently offers some of the capabilities I'm imagining with LinkedIn Prime, and so could be a good acquisition target if LinkedIn went in this direction. With a rich balance sheet, boasting over $600 million in cash and no debt, LinkedIn could make such an acquisition.
The competitive landscape doesn't offer up any immediate concerns. Of course, Facebook
"There is always going to be a 'place to be professional' and a 'different place to be fun,'" as Forbes recently put it.
Back to reality
LinkedIn has no plans to acquire Glassdoor.com or launch LinkedIn Prime, and I'm just building castles in the sky. Still, it's an intriguing idea, worth a few minutes' dreaming. If you're reading this, Reid Hoffman, take notice. You could democratize the workforce, change the face of the working world, and make billions in the process.
If, instead, you're an individual investor searching for the next great idea, why not check out The Motley Fool's latest free research report, "The Next Trillion-Dollar Revolution"? Inside the report, Motley Fool research analysts not only describe a seismic shift taking place now that will dwarf any other technology revolution seen before it, but also name a company at the forefront of the trend. Hundreds of thousands have requested access to previous reports, and you can access this new one today by clicking here -- it's free.
Catherine Baab-Muguira has no interest in any of the companies mentioned here. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, LinkedIn, Zillow, and Netflix. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Netflix, LinkedIn, Zillow, Facebook, and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have also recommended creating a bear put ladder position in Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.