On this day in economic and financial history ...
The Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) reached its all-time high on March 10, 2000, only a day after breaking the 5,000-point barrier. It was a positive day by only the slimmest of margins, as the tech-heavy index tacked on only 1.78 points to close at 5,048.64. At the same time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI), which was already 15% lower than its mid-January peak, fell further as its component drugmakers and financials shed value over fears of higher interest rates. It was a highly symbolic day, according to CNNMoney, as the Nasdaq held above 5,000 while the Dow sank beneath the 10,000-point level for only the fourth time since the previous April.
The Nasdaq's peak became the ultimate investing cautionary tale in later years, as swarms of pundits emerged to say "I told you so!" Where were they when the bubble was inflating to dangerous levels? Dot-com analysts pointed to "momentum" and "insatiable demand" without considering the financial fundamentals of the Nasdaq's many bubbly stocks. One of these analysts simply said that "if you're an astute observer, your portfolio will reflect what's new and exciting and dynamic." Everyone was buying trendy stocks because everyone was buying trendy stocks. It was circular logic at its finest.
A book titled Dow 100,000 had been published only half a year before the Nasdaq's peak, and it became widely mocked after the bust for its wide-eyed optimism. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, having apparently forgotten his 1996 pronouncement that the market suffered from "irrational exuberance," noted on March 10 that CEOs Jack Welch and Lou Gerstner of economic bellwethers General Electric (NYSE:GE) and IBM (NYSE:IBM) were both enraptured by the market's rise. Greenspan quoted the two executives as believing it was a "true revolution" and that "they have seen nothing like this in their experience."
That revolution sputtered out once investors realized that fundamentals simply couldn't support their optimism, and the endless economic expansion of the '90s wasn't so endless after all. The Nasdaq's P/E was well into triple-digit territory in the spring of 2000, aping a similar valuation bubble that blew Japan's Nikkei index to the moon in the 1980s. And just as the Nikkei fell for a generation, the Nasdaq has also been looking up at March 10, 2000, ever since. A decade after that peak, the Nasdaq had lost 63% with inflation taken into account, compared with a real decline of 28% in the Dow over the same time frame. GE and IBM, which both set all-time marks near the Nasdaq's peak, have spent more than a decade struggling to reclaim those levels. Still, they've done better than many Nasdaq stocks. A fifth of 1999's newly public companies fell off the Nasdaq completely by the end of 2000, and half of the rest had lost more than half of their initial value.
The Nasdaq's slide continues to be a low point for American markets many years later. Mark Hulbert of MarketWatch pointed out in early 2013 that "no other bear market in U.S. stock market history has been as awful as the Nasdaq's since 2000." In real terms, it was still 53% lower than its 2000 peak at the time, which makes it a worse performance than either the Dow's brutal Depression-era secular bear market or the stagflationary weakness that kept returns low from 1966 to 1982. There's still time for the Nasdaq to regain ground over these periods, but it's going to take a very strong performance -- perhaps on the scale of the 1990s -- to recapture its old heights.
I think it's for you
"Mr. Watson, come here -- I want to see you." Alexander Graham Bell had just spoken the first words ever heard through a telephone on March 10, 1876. This landmark utterance actually occurred three days after Bell had gained the first telephone patent ever issued in the United States, which was an unusual ordering in those days -- most patents were granted only after proof of concept. The race to create the telephone led to one of the great patent battles of American corporate history, as Bell fought off other inventors with better business acumen and cleverer legal tactics. This first phone call -- and the legal victories that followed -- led to the rise of AT&T (NYSE:T) as a national monopoly, as Bell's control of the industry strengthened in the years thereafter. Click here to read more about the innovation, intrigue, and subterfuge behind the creation of the telephone and the birth of AT&T.
Thomas Edison, patent troll
Legendary inventor Thomas Edison is so well known in large part because of his prolific use of the patent, and his subsequent dogged defense of those patents. However, not all of these defenses worked out. Edison lost an important patent lawsuit against American Mutoscope & Biograph on March 10, 1902, severely eroding his exclusive claim over the nascent field of motion pictures.
A circuit court decision, written by Judge William Wallace (middle name James; no known relation to the famous Scotsman played by Mel Gibson), states:
It is obvious that Mr. Edison was not a pioneer, in the large sense of the term, or in the more limited sense in which he would have been if he had also invented the film. He was not the inventor of the film. He was not the first inventor of apparatus capable of producing suitable negatives, taken from practically a single point of view, in single-line sequence, upon a film like his. ... Undoubtedly Mr. Edison, by utilizing this film and perfecting the first apparatus for using it, met all the conditions necessary for commercial success. This, however, did not entitle him, under the patent laws, to a monopoly of all camera apparatus capable of utilizing the film. Nor did it entitle him to a monopoly of all apparatus employing a single camera.
The decision reopened the floodgates of film competition, but it also pushed Edison toward a strategy of highly specific patents over numerous subsets of the filmmaking process. This new strategy -- common among hardware and software companies today -- allowed Edison to regain his dominance of the Eastern motion picture industry and also established a modern precedent of control over a new technology by patenting small but vital elements of its design. Edison's early East Coast competitors, eventually worn down by further patent suits, agreed in 1908 to create the Motion Picture Patents Company, the earliest motion-picture trust.
The MPPC had a major role in the rise of Hollywood, as its many restrictions on the filmmaking process pushed creative experimentation to the West Coast, far from the easy reach of Edison's patent lawyers and the courts that looked favorably on his claims. On the other hand, Edison did invent the lolcat video, so he had a fairly good idea of what people wanted to watch:
Eventually, the MPPC trust was broken by federal antitrust action in 1917, which only encouraged the establishment of another trust -- this one centered in Hollywood and built on the production and distribution of motion pictures, rather than on the patent system. Unfortunately, the new studio cartel didn't appreciate the lolcat quite so much, which meant that it would have to wait until the Internet was invented to catch on with the viewing public.