Eight hundred million dollars.
That's how much money Valero (NYSE:VLO) estimates it will cost to comply with the United States' Renewable Fuel Standard through the purchase of Renewable Identification Numbers, or RINs. It's a pretty hefty bill no matter how you spin it, and those charges can only lead to one thing: higher gas prices.
Let's look at this renewable fuel credit phenomenon and see why it's having such an effect on refiners' bottom lines and your gasoline bill.
From RINsanity to higher gas prices
When RINs were created in 2005, they were intended to reduce our reliance on foreign oil with a domestic energy source. In a way, they did their job rather brilliantly. The RIN credit enabled ethanol producers to earn an extra premium on their product that helped to cover the costs of development. Within six years, the production of ethanol shot up 257% and was helping to displace just over 9% of our fuel needs. As the production of ethanol increased, the price of RINs remained steady. Then this happened:
The massive run-up back in March was frightening, and it hasn't gotten much better since. Spot prices for D6 RINs -- corn ethanol -- hit an all-time high of $1.48 last week. For refiners to meet the requirements for the Renewable Fuel Standard, they have to buy these RIN credits, sometimes from the secondary markets completely independent of the purchase of the ethanol itself. This is one of the reasons Valero has given that $800 million figure for losses attributable to RINs, and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) has already given warning that RINs will have a significant impact on its earnings release in August.
Since RINs are having such an impact on company earnings, it's probably likely that the companies haven't been pricing RINs into their gasoline. That means we haven't seen a major uptick in gasoline prices -- yet. But it's awfully hard to imagine that refiners will remain so altruistic, so eventually these higher RIN costs will get passed down to the consumer.
How much? Let's do a little back-of-the-napkin math. Ethanol today comprises of 10% of all motor fuel, and for each gallon of ethanol there is a single RIN credit. Before now, we would have barely noticed these costs because RINs were relatively cheap -- about $0.01 per gallon. But if you use that same math with current RIN prices and assume refiners were to fully pass on the price of a RIN to the consumer, it would add about $0.15 to each gallon of fuel. This is probably not what the architects of the Renewable Fuel Standard program had in mind.
In a way, Valero has quite possibly the best case to make of anyone out there when it comes to the interaction of refiners and ethanol. Not only is the company a major oil refiner in the United States, but it's also America's No. 3 ethanol producer and is responsible for making just over 8% of the nation's corn ethanol supply. To paraphrase Valero CEO Bill Klesse, ethanol is a viable source of fuel that has some promise, but RINs are creating more problems than needed and need to be redone.
Long-term, Valero has the potential to be hurt less by the current RIN issue than many others. Currently, a hit of $800 million would cut out about 15% of the company's operating cash flow. But one of the major advantages that Valero shares with other independent refiners, such as Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66, is that they have a large capacity to export petroleum to premium markets that don't require ethanol blending and, thus, RIN credits. If RIN prices were to continue on their current track, it wouldn't be a stretch to see these refiners and several of the integrated majors push for more petroleum product exports to avoid these costs.
The ones that are in much more trouble are those that lack access to the export markets. We're looking at you, HollyFrontier (NYSE:HFC) and CVR Refining. HollyFontier estimates that RINs could hit the company's operational cash flow by about 9% based on its 2012 performance. That's not as much as Valero right now, but it doesn't take into account the other troubles that could lie ahead for these refiners. These two companies have all of their refining capacity in the mid-continent region of the United States. So not only can they not deflect some of their products to export markets easily to avoid RIN costs, but they're also more likely to suffer as the spread between Brent and West Texas Intermediate has gotten narrower throughout the past quarter.
The RIN/WTI spread double-whammy could be a tough to pill to swallow for the smaller refiners out there such as Holly Frontier and CVR Refining.
What a Fool believes
The problems for the refiner business come not from the use of ethanol. On the contrary, there are several companies that support the product and are hopeful that biofuels from cellulose can make it to the market. The larger issue today lies with the way the current Renewable Fuel Standard credits are structured. Since consumer habits for fuel consumption have changed, so, too, should the incentive structure and target levels for biofuel production.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.