American Banker Magazine recently ran a story titled "Consumers Are Now Banks' Greatest Regulatory Threat." The very fact that a reputable industry publication could run a story with that title is itself a telling indication of just how intrusive the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and other regulators are in the running of banks today.
The story is based on the creation of a public database run by the CFPB to collect consumer complaints about specific institutions directly from the consumers. If the CFPB so chooses, it can then increase regulatory scrutiny on that institution, potentially leading to enforcement action against the bank.
The CFPB sees the measure as a tool to more closely monitor a bank's compliance, but also as a way to force banks to provide better customer service and problem resolution.
The magazine points to TD Bank (NYSE:TD) at length for being a model for other banks to follow. They highlight TD Bank's designated social media group with an integrated problem resolution system. The system is so robust that if a customer tweets a complaint about a long wait at a drive-through teller window, management has the ability to video conference into that branch to assess the problem and fix it.
That is all well and good for banks like TD Bank with north of $800 billion in total assets. With that kind of scale, they can afford to hire teams of people to manage social media and implement cutting-edge software to integrate Twitter feeds to back office systems to track, manage, and respond to complaints.
But how in the world can smaller banks expect to succeed in this system? Is it right for the CFPB to regulate customer service? To me, it's way too far-reaching and an unreasonable burden for banks to bear.
What's next for the CFPB? Having a regulator in every branch ensuring that all the tellers are smiling when they greet a customer?
As an investor in banks, the current regulatory environment is quite troubling. Unfortunately for investors like you and me, the current attitude coming from Washington, D.C. is to micromanage the financial institutions in this country -- from the forms they use to originate mortgages to how they handle customer complaints.
I'm not interested in investing in a company being micromanaged by bureaucrats; I'm interested in investing in conservative, well-managed banks run by bankers interested in serving their communities and providing consistent, reasonable returns to shareholders.
Those banks are becoming harder and harder to find.
Fool contributor Jay Jenkins has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.