Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Free Article Join Over 1 Million Premium Members And Get More In-Depth Stock Guidance and Research

How Cheap Is Boardwalk Pipeline Partners LP?

By Rupert Hargreaves - Mar 10, 2014 at 1:29PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners' recent declines make the company look more attractive than peers Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer Partners.

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners LP ( BWP ) shocked the market at the beginning of February when the company announced that it was going to slash its quarterly unit distribution from $0.53, to $0.10. For investors, this move came as a surprise and removed one of the main attractions of Boardwalk's MLP structure: the previously promised 8.8% dividend yield.

After this move, Boardwalk's unit price was cut in half. However, after declines, Boardwalk now looks attractive in comparison to peers Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP) and Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP).

In comparison to peers
Boardwalk has been under pressure from falling natural gas prices during the past few years, but the company is not alone. Energy Transfer Partners operates almost entirely in natural gas, operating around 47,000 miles of transportation pipelines, and the company is therefore a suitable comparison to Boardwalk. Meanwhile, Kinder Morgan's recent strategic push into natural gas storage and transportation makes it another suitable comparison. 

Now, if we look at both Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer Partners, it quickly becomes apparent that Boardwalk, after recent declines, is the most attractive company. For a start let's take a quick look at valuations. I'm using the enterprise value to earnings before interest, tax, amortization, and depreciation, or EV/EBITDA, measure here to give a decent comparison as depreciation can significantly impact the earnings of these companies.

Company

TTM EV/EBITDA

Current distribution yield

Energy Transfer Partners

10.7x

6.7%

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners

11.6x

7.3%

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners LP

9.3x

3.2%

Source Yahoo! Finance. Figures based on numbers supplied during the last four quarters. TTM-trailing-twelve-months 

Going forward, we can see that Boardwalk is now the cheapest of the three companies with exposure to the natural gas market, although the company does offer the lowest distribution yield. Nevertheless, I believe that this low yield is actually a good thing long-term.

Pressing debt issue
One of the reasons that Boardwalk slashed its payout was to reduce debt -- in my opinion, a good move and something other industry players should follow. Reducing net debt is a top priority for Boardwalk as management has stated that their debt-to-EBITDA target is 4:1. Based on 2013 EBITDA, which came in at $650 million and third quarter net debt of around $3.3 billion, Boardwalk is somewhat over its targeted leverage ratio. What's more, this pile of debt is strangling cash flow as the company paid $163 million, or 25% of EBITDA out in interest during 2013. The partnerships' management also needs to consider, and take action against an increase in interest rates, which could be around the corner. Rising interest rates are perhaps Boardwalks most pressing issue, especially with such a towering debt pile.

No more units issued
Usually, master limited partnerships like Boardwalk would issue additional partnership units to fund growth alongside debt, which erodes per-share fundamentals and shareholder equity. This is the strategy that Boardwalk has followed in the past, increasing the number of units in issue by 16.2% over the past four years. Still, this pales in comparison to the number of units Energy Transfer has issued (125%) and Kinder Morgan (43%) from the end of 2009 to the end of the third quarter last year. Boardwalk's management has stated that no units will need to be issued this year. So, Boardwalk is now relying on its cash flow to fund expansion and reduce debt, good news for unitholders who won't see their equity eroded.

Others should follow suit
When it comes to spending, it would appear that Kinder Morgan also needs to cut back. The partnership was planning to spend $4.5 billion on growth projects during 2013, although distributable cash flow was going to be in the region of $2.1 billion after general partner payouts. The growth spending was to be funded by secondary unit offerings of $1.3 billion and debt issuance of $2.5 billion, as well as other interests, which will take net debt-to-EBITDA to 3.7x times -- this is not to mention the further deterioration of unit value through further unit issuance.  

While, Kinder Morgan's debt pile and cash flows are not yet an issue, there are accusations that the company could have understated its spending in order to boost cash returns to investors . Kinder Morgan paid out $1.7 billion in interest costs during 2013, around 40% of operating income. Meanwhile, debt costs for Energy Transfer Partners amounted to approximately 50% of operating income, excluding one-off items during 2013.

Foolish summary
So all in all, the case for Boardwalk as a value investment is simple, the company now trades at a discount to peers, and the lower distribution should allow the company more fiscal security in the future. More cash retained from operations will enable Boardwalk to pay down debt, reduce interest costs, and ultimately increase profits, something the company's peers, Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer Partners, will potentially have to do in the near future.

 

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis – even one of our own – helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners Stock Quote
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners
BWP

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
656%
 
S&P 500 Returns
144%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 12/01/2021.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Our Most Popular Articles

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with the Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from the Motley Fool's premium services.