Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHKA.Q) is America's second largest natural gas producer and the 11th largest producer of liquids in the country. That being said a company can be an industry leader and not a great investment. So, let's drill down deeper into Chesapeake Energy's stock and see what a financial ratio analysis tells us about the company as an investment.
Financial ratio analysis on growth
Chesapeake Energy grew from a startup seeded with $50,000 from its founders in 1989 to one of the top oil and gas producers in the country just over two decades later. However, the company's growth rate has slowed in recent years as too much debt put the brakes on its ambitious empire building. That being said, the company is still projecting solid growth over the next few years. Let's take a closer look at Chesapeake Energy's growth and compare it to some notable peers: EOG Resources (EOG -0.92%), Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) (RDS.B), Devon Energy (DVN -0.93%), ConocoPhillips (COP -1.55%), and Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD).
Company |
2Q14 Production |
Projected Production Growth Rates |
---|---|---|
Royal Dutch Shell |
3,077 MBOED |
Low single digit growth |
ConocoPhillips |
1,556 MBOED |
3%-5% growth per year through 2017 |
Chesapeake Energy |
695 MBOED |
7-10% adjusted growth in 2015 |
Devon Energy |
667 MBOED |
Mid-single digit growth |
EOG Resources |
591 MBOED |
~10% growth through 2017 |
Pioneer Natural Resources |
183 MBOED |
16%-21% growth through 2016 |
What we can note from this is that given its current daily production rate Chesapeake Energy's projected production growth rate really is right in line with its closest peers. It's not growing as fast as the smaller Pioneer Natural Resources, but it is growing a lot faster than big oil giant Royal Dutch Shell.
However, when it comes to turning that production growth into earnings growth, Chesapeake Energy comes up a little short. According to analysts, the five year projected earnings growth rates of the group as well as the price to earnings growth ratio, or PEG ratio, are as follows:
Company |
5-yr earnings growth rate |
PEG Ratio |
---|---|---|
Royal Dutch Shell |
5.50% |
1.65 |
ConocoPhillips |
8.34% |
1.31 |
Devon Energy |
14.49% |
0.73 |
Chesapeake Energy |
6.47% |
1.93 |
EOG Resources |
10.47% |
1.61 |
Pioneer Natural Resources |
17.35% |
1.9 |
What we see from this is that chart the Chesapeake Energy's earnings growth rate is projected to be similar to a company with more than twice its current production rate. Worse yet, investors are paying up for that growth as the company's PEG ratio is almost 2 when a ratio below 1 is considered cheap. Instead, a company like Devon Energy would be more appealing as it is projected to grow earnings at a faster clip and its stock is selling for a cheaper valuation.
Financial ratio analysis on returns
One of the reasons Chesapeake Energy's earnings aren't expected to grow as fast as most of its peers is because the company is still, at its core, a natural gas producer. Last quarter 72% of its production was natural gas compared to just 33% for Pioneer Natural Resources, 11% for EOG Resources, and 43% for Devon Energy and ConocoPhillips. While Chesapeake Energy is growing its higher margin oil and NGL production, it's not moving the needle as much as the oil focused growth at its peers.
We see this when we drill down deeper into an analysis of margins and returns by using the DuPont Model. Here are the factors of the DuPont Model:
Pop some numbers into a spreadsheet and this is what it spits out:
What we see here is that Chesapeake Energy's margins are below its peers due to its high concentration of lower margin natural gas production. This lower margin production also impacts its return on equity, which is lower than most of its peers. What this tells us is that in the future Chesapeake Energy needs to do a much better job improving its margins if it wants to boost its returns.
What can a financial ratio analysis tell us about Chesapeake Energy stock?
While Chesapeake Energy is a solid company and it's turnaround has it heading in the right direction, it still has some work to do. That outlook, however, could change as the company continues to reshape its portfolio. However, right now a financial ratio analysis tells us that its numbers are not as good as its peers, leaving us to conclude that there are better options for investors looking to find one great energy stock for their portfolio.