Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS) will report its third-quarter financial results before the opening bell on Wednesday, Nov. 5. The company has not provided guidance for the quarter (only for the full fiscal year),  but Wall Street's analysts expect  the 3-D printing leader to earn $0.57 per share on revenue of $195.5 million. These estimates would represent year-over-year growth of 55% on the top line and 27% on the bottom line, and investors seem to be expecting good news, since Stratasys' stock is up more than 25% since it reported second-quarter earnings with upgraded full-year guidance.

As one of the two leading companies in the red-hot 3D printing space, Stratasys' earnings are always the source of much investor interest and speculation. But some elements of the company's upcoming report will be more closely watched than others. Let's dig into some of Stratasys' key data points to figure out what's most likely to move its stock on Wednesday and beyond.

Will Stratasys boost its guidance again heading into the fourth quarter?
Stratasys has grown so quickly that it's found itself having to raise its guidance ranges on a fairly regular basis over the past couple of years. Here's what that's looked like since the end of 2012 for Stratasys' top-line guidance:


Previous Revenue Guidance

New Revenue Guidance

Increased By...

Q4 2012 

N/A (new fiscal year)

$430 million to $445 million


Q1 2013 

$430 million to $445 million



Q2 2013 

$430 million to $445 million

$455 million to $480 million

$25 million to $35 million

Q3 2013 

$455 million to $480 million

$470 million to $490 million

$10 million to $15 million

Q4 2013 

N/A (new fiscal year)

$660 million to $680 million


Q1 2014 

$660 million to $680 million



Q2 2014 

$660 million to $680 million

$750 million to $770 million

$90 million

Sources: Stratasys earnings reports.

Stratasys tends to boost its revenue guidance more frequently than it boosts EPS guidance -- since the end of 2012, it's only raised EPS guidance once, and that was when it raised full-year guidance from the $2.15 to $2.25 range to a new range of $2.25 to $2.35. The company's guidance boost in the second quarter was massive -- a $90 million upgrade works out to roughly 13% more revenue for the full year, and boosts year-over-year revenue growth expectations from 38% to 56% over 2013's $486.8 million top line.

On the other hand, Stratasys' EPS guidance boost only increased year-over-year growth expectations from 20% to 26% from the $1.84 in adjusted earnings per share the company reported for its 2013 fiscal year. Stratasys bulls are willing to ride the company's revenue as it screams into the stratosphere, but bears continue to wait on the sidelines for net margins (particularly on the GAAP side) to return to pre-Objet-merger levels. Thus far, the bulls look to be right, but if Stratasys has to change course on its optimistic new projections -- or even boosts its top-line guidance while leaving its EPS estimates alone -- its fall surge could reverse as profit concerns resurface.

How fast will MakerBot grow?
Stratasys bought consumer 3D printer superstar MakerBot a little over a year ago, and it began reporting MakerBot's revenue, though not its profitability, in the third quarter of 2013, the first quarter after the deal closed. Earlier data, supplied after the merger, can be used to paint a more complete picture of a company experiencing rapid (but somewhat erratic) growth:



Sequential Change

Full-year 2012*

$15.7 million


First-half 2013*

$28.3 million


Q3 2013**

$23.2 million


Q4 2013

$24.9 million


Q1 2014

$20.6 million


Q2 2014

$33.6 million


Source: Stratasys financial statements.
*2013 and 1H 2013 data converted to quarterly on 1-4 and 1-2 ratio, respectively, when used to calculate sequential growth rates for quarterly periods that follow.
**Q3 2013 data only available for Aug. 15 through Sept. 30. Figure here is doubled to represent a full quarter of revenue.

As you can see, MakerBot produced more sales in the second quarter of 2014 than it did during the first half of 2013, but its limited financial data offers us little in the way of clear trends. Will we see a similar jump in third-quarter sales this year as occurred last year? This will be the first year that we'll actually be able to examine MakerBot's year-over-year quarterly growth rates, so seasonal differences or not, it will be very interesting to see how the segment's performing now that it's been fully integrated into Stratasys.

When will Stratasys' bottom line -- GAAP or adjusted -- become more relevant?
Since its merger with Objet, Stratasys' earnings reports have veered rather far from their previous displays of profitability, to the point where reading the company's quarterly filings from top to bottom over the past two years has become almost like reading two different company reports that were awkwardly stapled together. On a pro forma basis, Stratasys-plus-Objet has grown both top and bottom lines at a brisk clip:

Sources: Stratasys earnings reports.
*Q3 data based on current analyst consensus. Q4 data based on Stratasys full-year estimates, less Q1 + Q2 reported results and Q3 consensus.

Stratasys' guidance implies some pretty impressive growth for the third quarter, at least on a non-GAAP basis. However, the picture looks less rosy when you compare Stratasys' top-line growth rate to its adjusted EPS growth -- if fourth-quarter EPS does come in at $0.78 as analysts expect, it will be the first time in the past six quarters that adjusted EPS has grown faster than revenue. No one appears to expect Stratasys' bottom-line growth to outpace its top line in the third quarter. But while everyone is focused on Stratasys' adjusted results, its GAAP numbers continue to look pretty darn ugly:

Sources: Stratasys earnings reports.
*Q3 data based on current analyst consensus. Q4 data based on Stratasys full-year estimates, less Q1 + Q2 reported results and Q3 consensus.

Stratasys' GAAP EPS tanked after its merger with Objet, and while this metric has improved somewhat in 2014, it has not been in positive territory on a trailing-12-month basis since the end of 2012. This can't be blamed on stock-based compensation, which can often produce huge swings in a high-tech company's earnings as it pays out millions to retain highly qualified employees and executives. For the first six months of 2014, Stratasys has adjusted away more than $38 million in the amortization of intangible assets (commonly used to write off goodwill from acquisitions) to reach its non-GAAP earnings figures, which is the equivalent of nearly 19% of its total sales for those two quarters. In contrast, famously acquisitive competitor 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) amortized just $17.4 million in intangibles --roughly 6% of over $299 million in first-half sales -- over the same period.

This is important to watch because it has occasionally been highlighted as a reason to be wary of 3D Systems, which has bought up so many companies that its intangible assets became the largest component of its balance sheet.


3D Systems 


Intangible assets

$177.8 million

$622.3 million


$404.1 million

$1,195.9 million

Total assets

$1,476.4 million

$2,782.2 million

Intangibles share of all assets



Sources: 3D Systems and Stratasys earnings reports.

With nearly twice the level of intangibles as a share of its balance sheet as 3D Systems, you can expect Stratasys to show uglier GAAP earnings for a while as it works that huge glob of accounting goo snake-like through its system. This huge discrepancy makes it hard to take either Stratasys' GAAP or adjusted earnings seriously as a measure of its profitability. Instead, investors may want to focus on Stratasys' operating cash flow, which has been barely positive so far in 2014 and has not been positive on a trailing-12-month basis since mid-2013:

SSYS Cash from Operations (Quarterly) Chart

SSYS Cash from Operations (Quarterly) data by YCharts.

What will you be watching for when Stratasys reports on Wednesday?

Editor's note: A previous version of this article treated MakerBot's revenue for the second half of Q3 2013, after Stratasys acquired it, as its revenue for a full quarter. The Fool regrets the error.

Alex Planes holds no financial position in any company mentioned here. Follow him on Twitter @TMFBiggles or connect with him on LinkedIn for more insight into investing, markets, economic history, and cutting-edge technology.

The Motley Fool recommends 3D Systems, BMW, Nike, and Stratasys. The Motley Fool owns shares of 3D Systems, Nike, and Stratasys. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.