Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Why Intel Corporation’s Google Glass Processor Will Be X86 and Not ARM Based

By Ashraf Eassa - Dec 4, 2014 at 11:13AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Could this be yet another use case for Intel's Silvermont core?

According to The Wall Street Journal, Intel (INTC 1.46%) is reportedly going to be providing the main processor for the next iteration of Google (GOOG 2.36%) (GOOGL 2.39%) Glass. Now, while there seems to be an implicit assumption that Intel will be supplying an x86-based processor into this device, some have speculated that it may be ARM (ARMH) based, as in the case of the Intel MICA bracelet.

However, I believe that Intel will indeed be supplying an X86-based chip into this device rather than an ARM one. Here's why.

What was in the prior Google Glass?
The first Google Glass contained a Texas Instruments (TXN 1.82%) OMAP 4430 processor, which featured two ARM Cortex A9 CPU cores. In order for the next version of the Google Glass to be an upgrade from the prior one, it would need to sport a faster processor.

Of course, something based on a more modern ARM core, such as the Cortex A12/A15, would be faster, but to my knowledge Intel has no plans to build chips around these newer ARM cores.

Some potential answers
An obvious solution, then, would be to use Intel's very own Silvermont processor core. This is higher performing and more efficient than the 45-nanometer implementation of the Cortex A9 processors found in the OMAP 4430.

However, while it seems that Intel's Silvermont processor core would be more than up to the task to power this next generation of Google Glass, it's not clear based on that core which system-on-chip Google might use. There are a couple of options:

  1. Custom system-on-chip: Intel may be designing a custom system-on-chip tailored to the Google Glass based on its Silvermont processor core.
  2. Merrifield/Moorefield/Bay Trail: Intel may repurpose one of its 22-nanometer Silvermont based system-on-chip products (Merrifield, Moorefield, or Bay Trail) for the task.
  3. Edison: Intel recently introduced a very low power platform known as Edison which uses two low-clocked Silvermont processor cores.

I don't think it would be worth Intel's time to spend the money on a full-blown custom system-on-chip for the Google Glass; the sales volumes probably aren't there to justify such an investment. Merrifield/Moorefield/Bay Trail might be good candidates, but they could be overkill (and relatively expensive) for the Google Glass use case.

Edison, though, which is designed specifically for embedded applications, may be the best bet here. The problem with Edison is that apparently the on-board graphics processor is disabled. However, according to one Intel employee in the forum thread linked previously, Edison's graphics were fused off because "the use cases around what is intended for Edison do not need video." The Google Glass would obviously be a use case that would seem to require video.

At any rate, it's probably X86
While some of the wearable devices that Intel supplies ultimately use ARM chips, I strongly believe that in this case, the Google Glass will be Intel X86 based. Intel can probably use at least one of the many 22-nanometer products in its portfolio for the task. Further, it is strategically important for Intel to push X86 here in order to have developer mindshare for whatever application ecosystem could arise from Google Glass and related devices.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of ARM Holdings and Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Intel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Intel Corporation Stock Quote
Intel Corporation
$36.11 (1.46%) $0.52
Texas Instruments Incorporated Stock Quote
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$185.38 (1.82%) $3.32
Alphabet Inc. Stock Quote
Alphabet Inc.
$121.68 (2.39%) $2.84
ARM Holdings plc Stock Quote
ARM Holdings plc
Alphabet Inc. Stock Quote
Alphabet Inc.
$122.65 (2.36%) $2.83

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/13/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.