Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Listener Question: Should Young Investors Bother With Dividends?

By Motley Fool Staff - May 1, 2016 at 9:42AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

A case for and against dividends, and why, yes, younger as well as older investors should have dividend stocks in their portfolios.

Young investors are often swept up in growth-only investing, and while that style does have potential for massive returns, it also has the more likely outcome for some rough sailing.

In this clip from the Market Foolery podcast, Chris Hill, Bill Mann, and Bill Barker explain why some people are against dividends as a concept, but why diversifying your portfolio with dividend stocks is a wise move for young investors as well as old.

A full transcript follows the video.

This podcast was recorded on April 13, 2016. 

Chris Hill: @MarketFoolery is our Twitter handle; you can hit us up with questions there. I got a question from Stukat31, who asked: "Do you think dividend stocks for a young investor is wise?" None of us are young investors. 

Bill Mann: Why do you have to go there?

Hill: I'm just saying ...

Mann: That's mean!

Bill Barker: Is it because we're on video today and we can't hide the fact?

Hill: Um ...

Barker: Whereas, normally, the listeners could entertain the notion that we're -- we need stunt doubles.

Hill: Do you think that's happening? Do you think there are listeners who have heard this podcast over the past few years, and thought, "Oh yeah, those three guys, they're easily in their 20s."

Barker: Hope so.

Mann: Yes, the answer is yes.

Hill: The question remains.

Barker: [laughs] The mystery is gone now.

Hill: Exactly.

Barker: Not that we're advocating that anybody watch the video.

Hill: No. But, if you are in your 20s or 30s, does that make sense?

Mann: I'll be honest. I don't really care about dividends. 

Hill: And you've been investing since your 20s, so I'm assuming, when you were in your 20s, you were like, "No." 

Mann: Eh, I mean, there is a theory, and we're going to start talking financial theory, so this is fantastic for a podcast.

Hill: Honey, come quick!

Mann: Yeah, run on in! The dividend irrelevance theory, which is really what I want from a business, that they do good things with their capital. If they don't have good things to do with their capital, returning it to shareholders through buybacks or dividends is perfectly legitimate. But whether a company pays a dividend or not, for me, is largely not that relevant. I mean, I think it becomes relevant for people as they grow older and would like a stream of cash coming back to them in a fairly tax-efficient way. But, buy good companies. Whether they pay dividends or not doesn't matter all that much.

Barker: So young investors should not exclude dividend-paying stocks, because there are many great ones, and it is part of a complete portfolio to have companies that are not all taking all of their money and investing it in growth. If that's your entire portfolio, I hope you're young, because --

Mann: Because you're going to visit some places.

Barker: Yeah, there are times when that's going to go wrong. But that's how many young people might think they are supposed to invest, is -- buy some explosive growth things, because if they explode, then you've got 30, 40, 50 years left to make the money back, which is true, and it is a reason to take on more risk when you're young. But, a lot of the great companies out there have been around for 40, 50, 80, 100 years, and don't need to take all of their profits and constantly try to grow the business at explosive rates.

So paying a dividend imposes a certain amount of discipline, and it relieves management of some of the pressure of constantly looking for ways to keep the growth machine going. Say you've got a payout ratio of 40%. You're paying out 40% of your profits every year to shareholders. You've only got to figure out what to do with the other 60%. That's easier on management than taking 100% of the profits every year and saying, "How do we keep this high growth equation going?" So there are a lot of great companies that pay dividends, and absolutely, young investors should be looking for not just big, risky bets, but great companies of all stripes.

Hill: But, I think that's one of the things that's changed over the last 15 years or so, is the perception of dividend stocks. I just remember, when I first started investing, and I was in my 20s --

Mann: So you've changed in 15 years, the perception!

Hill: No, I think the perception of dividend stocks was, big, stodgy, unimaginative, and almost completely lacking in growth. And we've seen plenty of examples over the last decade of companies that are able to establish healthy growth patterns, have market-beating returns, and oh, by the way, they also pay a dividend.

Mann: Yeah, that's Costco (COST 0.18%). What you've described is Costco. And I remember suggesting, I guess, 15 years ago now that Costco was one of the most innovative companies in America. "They're not a dot-com, they're not doing really cool things, they're not from Northern California, how could they possibly be innovative?" And I do actually, to Bill's point, think that having a dividend and having a statutory dividend does give companies some discipline.

And if you were to ask me if I wanted a slate of dividend-paying stocks versus a slate of mega-high-growth stocks, I'd take the dividend stocks every time. Every time.

Barker: The best stock over the last 40 or 50 years, I don't think it really matters what time period you're talking about, it's Philip Morris (PM -0.10%). That has been paying dividends all the way. That equation assumes you took the dividends and reinvested it in the stock, etc. But many of the great growth stocks over the last 40 or 50 years have paid dividends all the way. And then you need to reinvest the dividends for the maximum return on that kind of investment.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Costco Wholesale Corporation Stock Quote
Costco Wholesale Corporation
COST
$469.47 (0.18%) $0.86
Philip Morris International Inc. Stock Quote
Philip Morris International Inc.
PM
$102.34 (-0.10%) $0.10

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
319%
 
S&P 500 Returns
112%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 06/29/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.