Pardon my yawn at XM Satellite Radio's
Year | Subscribers | Y/Y % Change |
---|---|---|
2001 | 27,733 | N/A |
2002 | 347,159 | 1151.79% |
2003 | 1,360,228 | 291.82% |
2004 | 3,229,124 | 137.40% |
2005(*) | 5,034,602 | 100.10% |
XM's growth rate is slowing. Its base of existing subscribers makes each additional subscriber less meaningful. It's only natural for a maturing company's growth to slow. The question is, now that XM is scaling up, can it convert its customer base into profits? The answer is a resounding "no" thus far. Take a look at some key data from this most recent quarter, compared to year-ago levels:
Q3 2004 | Q3 2005 | Y/Y % Change | |
---|---|---|---|
Subscribers | 2,516,023 | 5,034,602 | 100.10% |
Subscription Price | $9.99 | $12.95 | 29.63% |
Operating Profit | ($100,580,000) | ($109,553,000) | 8.92% |
Net Profit | ($120,143,000) | ($134,018,000) | 11.55% |
I'm not excited by a company that managed to double its subscribers, substantially raise its prices, yet still somehow increase its operating and net losses. Thanks in large part to the talent bidding war between XM and archrival Sirius
Pipeline companies like Kinder Morgan
Wait! You're not done. This is just a quarter of the Duel! Don't miss the Bear opening argument and the Bull opening argument and the Bull rebuttal. Even when you're done, you're still not done. You can vote and let us know who you think won this Duel.
At the time of publication, Fool contributor Chuck Saletta owned shares of Kinder Morgan Management. The Fool has a strict disclosure policy.