[Are] Google [AdSense's] days over? Haven't web surfers gotten so used to seeing the ad formats and typical locations that they just know where not to look by ad blindness? The only thing I see Google
(NASDAQ:GOOG)has for it in the near term is brand named search.
But here's the thing: DoubleGoo may be taking steps to counter the very issues that SwingPoint raises. ComputerWorld reports that Google is testing user input on search results. See something you don't like? Delete it. Or move it lower in the algorithm rankings. Or comment on the uselessness of the link.
For its part, Google isn't saying how or when these features might get implemented. "At this point, I can't say what we expect from this feature; we're just curious to see how it will be used," Distinguished Engineer Ben Gomes wrote in a blog post.
Allow me to offer a prediction: Give users tools to sharpen their search results, and they'll do so. They'll try to make Google smarter; Gomes and his peers should be grateful if they do. A smarter Google would produce more relevant search results. More relevant results would lead to more relevant ads, for which Google could charge more.
I get it, Mr. Gomes: Google is good at experiments. Experiment away. But please also remember that while your lead in search is growing, Microsoft
Get your clicks related Foolishness:
Fool contributor Tim Beyers had positions in Google's shares and 2010 LEAP options at the time of publication. He hunts for the best of tech as a contributor to Motley Fool Rule Breakers, which counts Google among its core holdings. Here's how to try this market-beating service free for 30 days. Microsoft is an Inside Value pick. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy wonders: If an engineer isn't distinguished, will he be extinguished?