Rule Breaker. I'll never forget the day I heard those two words.
I was whispering on the phone to an old pal. He'd tipped me to a local scientist who claimed he was about to crack the human genome. There was an IPO. I bought in and forgot it.
What the heck is going on here?
By Christmas, the stock was doubling weekly. Apparently, some Fool named David Gardner announced he'd also bought the stock for his Rule Breakers portfolio. In December 1999, I hadn't the foggiest idea what that meant, but it sure seemed to be moving the market.
Good times. I imagine this must all seem a bit quaint now -- in this economy and this market -- where until recently, almost nothing seemed to be working. But I assure you, there are companies doing good work out there, and some have gotten downright cheap.
And if you're a regular here, you may have also heard that Rule Breaker investing is back. But it may not be what you think. It's certainly not what I thought when I heard those two words.
For one thing, it's not all about tech
Yes, there was some technology in Gardner's original Rule Breakers portfolio. But as it turns out, it's not so much disruptive technologies he was after as disruptive businesses. Gardner points out, for example, that Dell
But do you know what really made Starbucks a Rule Breaker in 1998? It was way out in front. There was no second fiddle. If you bought Starbucks along with David in 1998, you're a Rule Breaker, too.
So, just what makes a Rule Breaker investor?
To find out, I caught up with David Gardner and asked him. His reply? "A Rule Breaker is an investor who can embrace the contrary nature of paying up for great growth stocks." That's an important point.
David points out how, even in down markets, great growth companies rarely look "cheap." In my line of work, I think back to when companies like Schwab
They seemed risky at the time. Now, they look to have run their course. But, in their sweet spot, Rule Breakers like these are worth the gamble. They make investors a lot of money.
Should you take Gardner's word for it? I would.
Turns out, when David shuttered his real-money Rule Breakers portfolio, he'd managed a 20.1% annualized return. That was in mid-2003, after the bear market. Compare that with 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 7.3% for the Nasdaq over the same period. That's the kind of outperformance that made legends of Peter Lynch and Bill Miller, and rightfully so.
But are you a Rule Breaker?
That's a valid question. Riding the growth tiger can get scary. David learned that when the genome stocks blew up in 2000, and more recently when his team recommended Google
Then again, David also led us to Baidu
The trick, of course, is spotting them early and having the guts to buy when you do, especially when there's so much fear in the market. It certainly helps to get your information from someone you can trust -- someone with a proven track record, who does the legwork. In other words, not from some wa-hoo like my old pal on the phone.
So, why not go straight to the source?
Listen, I know times are tough. That's why I want you to accept a 30-day free trial to David Gardner's Motley Fool Rule Breakers newsletter. That way, you can test-drive the complete service, and you won't have to spend a lot of money to see what David and his team of analysts are digging up now.
You can even read all back issues and cherry-pick every active and past pick for free during your trial. Of course, there's never any pressure to subscribe. If you don't like what you see, you don’t pay a cent.
I can't say you'll get rich quick if you accept. But I can promise that you'll get some great ideas, and that you have nothing to lose. If you think you're up to it and want to learn more about taking a free trial, click here.
This article was originally published on Dec. 16, 2004. It has been updated.
Fool writer Paul Elliott doesn't own any of the stocks named here. Starbucks and Schwab are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Wal-Mart, Starbucks, and Dell are Inside Value recommendations. Baidu and Google are Rule Breakers picks. The Motley owns shares of Starbucks and has a disclosure policy.