Critics see this "fragmentation" as a big problem because a piece of application software that's developed for the Android 2.1 environment may not run on older handsets. That's presumably why Apple
Well, I call baloney on several grounds:
- Android is an open platform, and the only handset where Google directly controls anything is the Nexus One. Big G won't tell Motorola, HTC, or Samsung how to manage their software versions.
- Software upgrades do happen. The HTC Hero (aka Droid Eris) has moved from 1.5 to 2.1 in recent months; the venerable T-Mobile, a unit of Deutsche Telekom
(NYSE: DT)myTouch 3G by HTC will get upgraded from 1.6 to the tasty 2.2 "Froyo" version "soon," as T-Mobile pledges to have "no phones left behind."
- Platform updates add new features, but they generally don't muck around with the basic architecture of the Android system. Write a birthday reminder app for Android, and you won't need the functionality introduced in 2.1 or 2.2 -- feel free to target the entire market. But if your app uses Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync or HTML5 browser features, newer upgrades like 2.1 become the baseline, and those silly myTouch 3G users will just have to experience your software's greatness after their platform refresh.
As a myTouch 3G user myself, I'm drooling uncontrollably over the improvements in Froyo, but patience is still a virtue. Android is as successful as it is today precisely because of rapid innovation and a diverse field of end-user products. If you bought a T-Mobile G1 in 2008, you were an early adopter with all the risks and benefits of that status. So your handset is obsolete now? Join the original iPhone owners, whose beloved gadgets won't see Apple's latest and greatest operating system at all. That's the march of progress on the bleeding edge, folks.
Is the Android user base fragmented? Oh, sure. Is it a problem? Not at all. If you're stuck with an older Android phone and insist on a fresher software platform, nobody is stopping you from buying a more modern handset, after all. Hey, that's how Apple does it, right?
Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares in Google, but he holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.
More from The Motley Fool
Why Alphabet Investors Don't Care About Voting Rights Anymore
Take a closer look at its two publicly traded classes of stock.
3 Companies Using Artificial Intelligence to Their Advantage
The companies' stocks could benefit as they take advantage of multibillion-dollar opportunities.
My 3 Biggest Stock Holdings
Netflix, Micron Technology, and Alphabet are crowding out all other tickers in this investor's real-money portfolio. Here's how, why, and what they're up to next.