At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." While the pinstripe-and-wingtip crowd is entitled to its opinions, we've got some pretty sharp stock pickers down here on Main Street, too. (And we're not always impressed with how Wall Street does its job.)
Given that, perhaps we shouldn't be giving virtual ink to "news" of analyst upgrades and downgrades. And we wouldn't -- if that were all we were doing. Fortunately, in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.
And speaking of the best …
Yesterday, "rare earth" investor-darling Molycorp
What's got Global Hunter so hot for Rare Element? As StreetInsider.com reports, the analyst likes the fact that: "Rare Element Resources … is advancing the Bear Lodge rare earth project towards production … [of] critical/strategic metals currently in short supply and facing export restrictions from China. We believe the project's location, straightforward mining plan and relatively low capex makes Rare Element a compelling investment at this time."
Now, we've been hearing about the Chinese-quota case for buying rare earths companies for quite some time. But here's something you may not have heard about Rare Element: "The company also has an adjacent low grade, but high tonnage gold deposit, Sundance, which has a resource in excess of 900k oz Au. We believe that Rare Element is undervalued based on the upcoming catalysts and advantages over other development companies in the [rare earth element] sector."
REE -- Q.E.D?
A rare earths play with a gold-bug kicker? It sounds too good to be true. And yet, Global Hunter has a pretty decent record of picking winners in the metals and mining sector. It's only 50-50 on its pickers here historically, granted. But winning bets on precious metals miners, like its recommendation to buy profitable Silvercorp
Me. That's who.
The trouble with Rare Element
The problem with recommending Rare Element, you see -- the thing that sets it apart from Silvercorp -- is that unlike Silver Corp, Rare Element isn't just unprofitable. It's downright un-revenue-able. Not a silver (or gold) penny's worth of revenue in the stream, and it's burning cash to boot. Sure, maybe there's gold in them thar hills. Maybe there's even some recoverable rare earths.
Bulls may say Rare Element is poised to begin production any day -- but face facts, Fools. Rare Element has been "getting ready" to produce for eight years now, and still hasn't generated any revenue at all -- from lanthanum or from gold either one. (Just lots of money from selling pipedreams to investors.)
Will Rare Element eventually start producing? Perhaps. But investors today have no way of knowing how profitable (if profitable at all) the company will become. Rare earth prices are through-the-roof today, owing to Chinese quotas on their export. But over in Europe, the WTO is busily working to tear down China's export restrictions. If it succeeds, much of the investment case for mining "rare" earths (which really aren't that rare at all -- just not very profitable to extract) in North America could evaporate.
As for Global Hunter's gold idea, well sure, it's intriguing. But the key reason to own Rare Element has always been its rare elements. If you're looking for a gold play, you're probably better off buying someone who's actually mining the stuff, and making a profit off of it, like Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold
My advice: Leave the gambling to the professional gamblers on Wall Street. Personally, I prefer real companies, with real profits.
Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of (or short) any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 563 out of more than 170,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.