I'm going to go out on a limb and say VIVUS'
I admit I'm now standing on a branch that's 6 inches in diameter and only a foot off the ground, but this is the Food and Drug Administration, after all. Anything is possible.
The confidence in an approval, from me and most of the rest of the investing world, comes from three sources:
- The FDA advisory committee gave the drug a resounding 20-2 endorsement back in February.
- The FDA delayed the decision in April, which seems like a strange move if the agency had other problems with the drug beyond needing to review the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy.
- And most recently, the FDA approved Arena Pharmaceuticals'
Belviq, signaling an end to the agency's apparent stance that obesity drugs had to be perfect to gain approval. (Nasdaq: ARNA)
The smaller, less-stable limb that investors have to venture out on if they want to hold over the binary event is what the REMS will look like. Qnexa will have restrictions on its use -- that's what a REMS is for -- but the different scenarios could have different effects on how well Qnexa sells.
The FDA doesn't want Qnexa prescribed to women who might become pregnant, because one the components of the drug is Johnson & Johnson's
How the FDA determines whether patients are pregnant is key to whether the drug is a commercial success. At one extreme, the FDA could simply tell doctors they need to ask female patients whether they're pregnant. At the other extreme, the FDA might require patients to get a monthly pregnancy test from their doctor. The added inconvenience of a monthly trip to the doctor's office could hamper sales. Somewhere in between those extremes, the FDA might be content with self-reporting of a home-based pregnancy test.
The FDA tends to error on the side of caution -- just look at the large preapproval heart trial it's requiring Orexigen Therapeutics
That's my take. What's yours? Take our Foolish poll and let us know your reasoning in the comment box below.
Fool contributor Brian Orelli holds no position in any company mentioned. Check out his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Johnson & Johnson and creating a diagonal call position in Johnson & Johnson. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
The 3 Most Disappointing Drug Launches of All Time
Treatments with huge promise don't always pan out the way you'd expect.
Why Vivus Inc Plummeted Today
Vivus Inc shares tanked today following results that failed to impress.
Forget About Ebola Stocks and Invest in This Instead
Instead of Ebola drugmakers, investors may be better served focusing on these healthcare trends.