I've given PetroChina
First-half production rose 4.5% to just more than 470,000 BOE per day. This growth, which slightly outpaced PetroChina's pump-up, came entirely from natural gas -- oil production was essentially flat. Oil prices, on the other hand, were decisively down, and that cut into revenues by roughly 7%. After factoring in higher exploration and operating expenses, as well as a windfall profit tax, net profit came in 11% lower than last year.
The big growth in gas output slightly shifted CNOOC's product mix from 84% oil last year to 80% this year, but the company is still very oil-oriented. Given that mix, I'm surprised to see the gas-heavy players that CNOOC identifies as its peer group. A comparison to prodigious producers like Apache
Well, in terms of production growth, sure, but CNOOC shows up remarkably well in terms of its cost structure. It even edges out low-cost dynamos like XTO Energy
Offshore players have to shell out a lot more for exploration, thanks in part to soaring dayrates on semisubmersible rigs. The availability of deepwater rigs, or lack thereof, is one of the greatest cost pressures that CNOOC will face over the next several years. With a success rate below 70%, the firm is going to have to drill a lot of wells in order to organically add reserves on a regular basis. Unless, that is, it can make better use of state-of-the-art seismic and controlled source electromagnetic data. But that's a story for another day.
For related Foolishness:
Who exactly is making windfall profits, anyway?
PetroChina is feeling the pressure.
Check out Devon's double-digit dash.
If it's more international energy investment ideas you crave, the market-beating
Motley Fool Global Gains
team's got 'em. You can read about all the foreign values they've identified with a free 30-day trial.
Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't own shares in any company mentioned. The Motley Fool has no need to shore up its disclosure policy.