LONDON -- You expect FTSE 100 companies to be solid, dependable and boring. At least stock market nostalgia suggests that used to be the case.
Yesterday's 24% plunge in the share price of Standard Chartered is just the latest in a string of unfortunate incidents that have savaged the pockets of investors since BP
BP's catastrophe arose out of a poor safety culture, and maybe a large dose of bad luck. But it is a high-risk company that takes big bets, and nowhere is that more evident than in its Russian joint venture.
In 2003, BP folded its Russian interests into TNK-BP, a 50/50 joint venture with a consortium of oligarchs called AAR. The venture has proved to be a great operational success, and now accounts for a third of BP's production and a quarter of reserves. Dividends from TNK-BP funded most of BP's own dividend last year.
Tensions
But there have been tensions from the outset. To seal the deal, BP gave AAR first refusal to participate in all of its activities in Russia. BP's flirtations with state-owned oil and gas companies Rosneft and Gazprom, both run by executives close to President Vladimir Putin, inflamed the oligarchs. Robert Dudley, then TNK-BP's CEO, fled the country in fear for his safety.
During June, BP announced it had received "unsolicited approaches" to buy its 50% interest, which the group intends to pursue. The following month, Rosneft said it was interested in acquiring the stake. AAR is negotiating to acquire half of BP's stake, which would give the oligarchs control in the venture. BP says it will sell all or nothing.
A legal case brought by AAR against BP rumbles on in the background. Last month, a minority investor won a 3 billion-pound damages claim against BP in a remote Siberian court, a case widely seen as lacking merit but designed to put pressure on BP. AAR has blocked dividend payments from TNK-BP, which will constrain BP's cash flow.
Russian lessons
There are features of this story that are familiar to many foreign businesses operating in Russia:
- Russians prefer joint ventures where they have control.
- Local partners can have hidden agendas.
- Hostile actions may be conducted through third parties.
- The government may interfere. Tax and other regulatory authorities, or state-owned entities, are common weapons of choice.
- It's not just government, but politics. Who's in or out of power matters.
- Courts are unreliable. The further they are from Moscow, the more brazen they may be.
- If things turn bad, they can turn physical.
The remarkable thing is that a company the size of BP should bet so much of its business in such an environment.
Pundits have had a field day speculating on possible outcomes. They assume BP has a choice, but it seems to me that in the monumental struggle between the Russian state players and powerful oligarchs, it's quite possibly BP that will get squeezed and be forced to accept an offer it can't refuse.
High risk
So it's high-risk stuff. BP's shares still trade at a discount as it claws its way back from the Deepwater Horizon disaster. If the company pulls off a good result in Russia, and the final cost of its U.S. misadventure isn't too severe, its shares could rocket. But the risk of things going the other way is still very real.
It's quite a different scenario at BP's FTSE 100 peers.
Royal Dutch Shell
Companies in the oil and gas sector can be high-risk, but of course they can also provide high rewards. In my view, diversification is one of the best ways of managing the inherent investment risks of this particular industry.
To learn more about diversifying within the oil and gas sector and how it could grow your potential wealth, I'd urge you to read this new Motley Fool report: "How to Unearth Great Oil and Gas Shares". Just click here and the report will be dispatched immediately to your inbox free of charge.
Oils, Pharmaceuticals, Banks, Telecoms -- just where should you invest today? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. The report is free.
More investment opportunities
