When Tennyson wrote " 'Tis better to have loved and lost, than never to have loved at all," he wasn't speaking about stock market losses.
But as many investors can attest from our roller-coaster experiences over the past year, sometimes it's better to have kept it all in cash than to have watched gains evaporate.
Indeed, a number of behavioral studies have found that humans experience more pain from our losses than we experience pleasure from our gains. And that phenomenon -- what researchers call loss aversion -- can lead to bad investing habits like chasing returns, selling prematurely, or, worse, being too scared to invest at all.
Fortunately, there's a way for us to enjoy our gains, reduce downside risk, and not spend a dime out of pocket to do it: an options-based strategy long used by money managers to handle their clients' profitable positions called a "cashless collar."
How does it work?
Let's start with an example. Say you purchased 100 shares of Apple back in 2006 for $53 per share and it's currently trading for $317 -- a solid 498% gain. Now what to do? You have several choices, the more popular of which are:
- Hold on tight and hope for even more gains.
- Sell immediately and pocket the profits.
- Place a trailing-stop sell order.
- Buy a protective put option.
While each of these four strategies has merit, they also each have substantial risks.
|Hold and hope||Enjoy theoretically limitless upside.||Stock could fall sharply and you lose most -- if not all -- of your gain.|
|Sell now||Cash in your pocket.||Creates significant taxable event; miss additional upside.|
|Trailing-stop||Reduce downside risk.||Stock could fall temporarily to your sale price and then recover sharply.|
|Protective put||Secure a price floor.||Costs money out of pocket -- could lose all of it if stock rises.|
A less popular -- but more effective -- choice is the aforementioned cashless collar. Here you buy a protective put (ideally about six months out) at a price below the current price and simultaneously write a covered call option expiring in the same month at a price above the current price, thus establishing a range or "collar" around the current price. The proceeds from the sale of the covered call finance the cost of the protective put, hence the "cashless" part of the strategy.
Painting the picture
In the case of Apple, then, it might look something like this:
- Current price: $317
- Buy one April 2011 $300 put for $17.60
- Sell one April 2011 $330 call for $19.95
So while you pay $17.65 per share ($1,765 per contract) for the price floor of $300, you simultaneously receive $19.95 per share ($1,995 per contract) to establish the upper limit of $330. In fact, in this scenario you actually get paid -- better than "cashless" -- $2.35 per share ($235 per contract) to enter into this arrangement through April 15, 2011.
Let's consider the potential outcomes:
|Apple is between $300 and $329.99||Both options expire worthless. You hang onto your shares, can enjoy any small upside, and the $2.35-per-share credit is yours to keep, too.|
|Apple plummets to $90||Phew. You exercise your right to sell the shares at $300; the covered call expires worthless.|
|Apple falls modestly to $290||Decision time. You can exercise your right to sell the shares at $300 or if you'd rather hold on to your shares, you can choose to do nothing and also keep the $2.35-per-share credit.|
|Apple surges to $500||Least-ideal scenario. Since you've "capped" your sale price at $330, you're missing out on the upside.|
As you can see, the biggest risk to a cashless collar is that the stock surges well above your upper limit and you're locked out of enjoying those gains.
The key to managing that risk is prudent business valuation, for if you have an idea of the company's true value, you'll be more comfortable selling at the higher strike price.
Other worthy candidates
The following stocks all sport forward price-to-earnings ratios above the S&P 500 average of 14.0. If you've enjoyed outsized gains with any of these stocks over the past year, a cashless collar could be well worth considering.
Price Change-One Year
Whole Foods Market
Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Data provided by Capital IQ, as of Dec. 2, 2010.
Could these companies go much higher from here? Possibly, but investors in these stocks will have to ask themselves if the potential upside outweighs the downside risk. If the answer is yes, then a cashless collar may not be ideal, but if the answer is no, it's time to look more closely into a cashless collar strategy.
Foolish final word
Done correctly, a cashless collar can provide you with peace of mind on a profitable position and still maintain sell discipline. And best of all, it can be implemented with no out-of-pocket cost.
While this isn't an everyday strategy, it's worth understanding as another tool to help successfully manage your profits.
Want to learn more about options strategies that can enhance your returns while lowering volatility? Our Motley Fool Options service can help -- enter your email address in the box below for more information.
This article was originally published Aug. 3, 2009. It has been updated.
Fool analyst Todd Wenning can't wear turtleneck collars because his head's too big. He does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. Akamai Technologies is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Apple and Whole Foods Market are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Apple.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Las Vegas Strip News: Steve Wynn Acquires Another Big Plot of Land
Wynn Resorts could have its sights set on another megaresort after buying 38 acres of land on the north side of the Las Vegas Strip.
Why L Brands, Inc. Shot Up 30% in November
With the exit of its swimwear and apparel lines firmly in the rearview mirror, investors are starting to focus on results of L Brands' core businesses.
Why Wynn Resorts Is the Hottest Casino Stock
Wynn Resorts' growth is about more than Macau's recovery in 2017.