Compared to the prior-year quarter, revenues were up a slim 4%. Sales reached $8.4 billion. But earnings, as everyone is reporting, were up an astonishing 44% to $0.69 per share. How did the firm pull off such a feat? Tight cost controls and increased operating efficiencies?
Not exactly. Results in the prior-year quarter included some big charges, $0.24 per share in total. That means this year's $0.69 from operations could be considered a step back from last year's non-charge $0.72. Look at it however you like.
Yes, there were improvements worth noting. Information technologies revenues jumped 33% to become the fourth-biggest sales generator. Gross margins in aeronautics climbed by 0.9%, and the progress was 1.5% in space systems and 1.2% in integrated systems. But there was a slight slip in electronics systems.
In general, the firm seems to be executing well and profiting from a relatively generous defense budget, a situation that also holds benefits for Northrop Grumman
Guidance for 2005 came in somewhat below the Street's expectations, with revenues predicted around $3.25 per share, representing earnings growth just 20%better than what's expected for 2004. If you're wondering why a slow giant that depends on government largesse is trading at a P/E ratio that matches its growth rate, the answer may be cash flow. The firm has put up a very healthy $2.4 billion in free cash flow so far this year.
The stock looks reasonably valued, and it has been a steady performer so far this year, outpacing the broader market. Just keep an eye open. Capital-intensive operations like these often mean that the shareholder's real payoff disappears into the land of negative free cash flow. Look back at a few years' worth of annuals to see. Should that happen, this slow grower will no longer look like such a bargain.
For related Foolishness:
- Who stands to benefit from a defense budget boom?
- Will the Navy scuttle shipyards?
- Relive the exciting Titan