Looking back at past Motley Fool articles on Diebold, it seems like there's always an excuse for why the numbers aren't strictly comparable with the year-ago period and/or why the numbers weren't quite as good as they should be. Well, I don't want to play that game.
Revenue for the first quarter was up 8.4% as reported and 6.5% on a constant-currency basis. The financial segment (ATMs, mostly) grew the top line at a 4.9% rate (again, constant-currency), with 10% product growth offset by 1.2% service growth. Security revenue growth was much stronger at 19.6%, and election system revenue was down 60.6%.
A restructuring charge sent gross margin down for the quarter, as well as operating margin. Reported operating profit declined about 7% from last year because, in part, of that restructuring charge. Earnings per share were down year over year including the charge, but up about 12.5% without the charge.
In lowering guidance for the full year, Diebold management said it believes rising fuel costs would hurt results by about $0.02 a share. Now, I really don't know what to say about that. If a company like Caterpillar
The fact is, I'm rather cranky with respect to Diebold. I don't like what seems to be an ongoing cycle of "yeah, buts" -- as in, "yeah, business is good and our products are competitive, but this or that hurt results." The fact is, if you look back, you see a company that has grown revenue at a compounded rate of about 13%, book value at a rate of about 10%, and profits at a rate of about 12%.
That's not bad at all, but recent growth trends have been pretty anemic. What's more, the company seems to be budgeting restructuring charges into its ongoing guidance -- something that just irks me and shows investors that "one-time items" often aren't.
Clearly, then, I'm not going to be favorably inclined toward this stock. While I can appreciate reasons for optimism about the business -- cash-flow generation is good, electronic voting is the future, and the new Opteva line seems to be selling well -- I would prefer to see solid double-digit earnings growth without having to add back charges and items before I get more excited about owning a piece of this business.
For more on Diebold, check out these takes:
Fool contributor Stephen Simpson has no financial interest in any stocks mentioned (that means he's neither long nor short the shares).
More from The Motley Fool
The Online Grocery Market Is Amazon's to Lose
Amazon's online grocery sales doubled its next closest competitor in 2017.
Social Security's 3 Purposes, and the 1 Thing It Was Never Intended For
America's most important social program is tasked with providing a financial backdrop for tens of millions of Americans.
3 Key Metrics for Duluth Holdings Investors to Watch
With most of the company’s growth tied to expanding retail sales, here are a few simple ways to measure its progress.