Two years ago, I wrote an article advising you to ignore a few market-timing bears who'd crept out of the woods following a five-month, 12% rise in the S&P 500 -- a 12% rise, mind you, that was fresh on the heels of a 23% loss in 2002.
My column was inspired by a Washington Post article titled "Investors Decide to Run With the Bulls: With Economy Shaky, Some Analysts Whisper 'Irrational Exuberance.'" The Post quoted several skeptics who generally derided us small investors for buying into an overvalued market that was ripe for a fall. Part of their argument centered on a historically high price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500, which was near 30 at the time, according to data provided by Barra.
Two years later, however, the S&P 500 is up roughly 22% and the Nasdaq has gained 28%. And guess what? The market's P/E has actually contracted to below 20 during that period.
I bring this up not to say "I told you so," because I didn't. As I explained then, I had no idea where the market was going in the near term, and neither did anyone else. Instead, I'm calling this to your attention to remind you of a basic Motley Fool Hidden Gems investing tenet: We buy companies with the intention of holding them for a very long time. Stories can change, of course, and we may very well sell after a short period. It happened with Talk America
Over your investing lifetime, you'll have several losers and several marginal winners. If you've chosen well, however, you'll also have a small handful of massive, multiyear outperformers, and if you follow the "buy right, sit tight" strategy and hang on to those winners, your chances of significantly beating the market are greatly enhanced.
If you've sworn off individual stocks and invest only in an index fund, you have even more reason to ignore the pundits and gurus trying to scare you out of the market. As I've said before, it's perfectly valid to discuss the valuations of Lucent
Take a look at this logarithmic chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1929 to the present. It beautifully points out both the risks and rewards involved in stock investing. It's hard to pick a random point that does not see the chart higher 10 years later, and, of course, the entire 75-year period shows average returns of about 10% per year. Still, nothing is risk-free, and those who first entered the market with a lump sum in 1929 had to endure many years before they earned back their principal.
And yet, as Benjamin Graham pointed out in his classic The Intelligent Investor, a person who began dollar-cost averaging into the market in 1929 would have earned more than 8% compounded annually by 1948 -- despite the Dow's value falling from 300 to 177 during that period!
Invest through thick and thin, dear Fool. Don't bother timing the market.
Different paths to victory
Tom recently told his Hidden Gems members that he fully expects -- years down the road -- to meet some of them who hold as many as 40 to 50 different small-cap stocks that they found in the pages of the newsletter. Dollar-cost averaging. Consistently buying. Holding. Some may wind up like the legendary Shelby Davis, owning hundreds of stocks worth millions of dollars.
Don't let that scare you. Although a fine way to invest, that type of diversification isn't for everybody. Perhaps you'd rather own very few stocks at any one time -- similar to the Warren Buffett punch-card strategy. That's valid also, especially for the more experienced.
If you need good small-cap stock ideas, Tom has a no-risk 30-day free trial offer for Hidden Gems. But whatever your preference, we encourage you to start investing if you're not yet doing so and to continue investing if you are. Years down the road, you'll be glad you did.
Rex Moore will write for food, preferably doughnuts. He works with Tom Gardner digging for Hidden Gems but owns no companies mentioned in this article. Check out his profile and the Fool's disclosure policy.
This column was originally published on June 9, 2004. It has been updated.
More from The Motley Fool
What's the Best Age to Claim Social Security? It Depends on Your Health
The state of your health needs to be a driving factor in deciding when to take benefits. Here's why.
3 Fools, 1 Deep Dive Into the Disney/Fox Deal
Even for a media company as acquisitive as Disney, the assets it's picking up in this $52.4 billion purchase are major.
3 Dividend Stocks With Better Yields Than Johnson & Johnson
These stocks would serve your income portfolio better than Johnson & Johnson today.