The Times, it is a-changing -- or at least trying mightily to do so. In this case, I'm referring to New York Times
New York Times' results were soft, but not horrible. In a real sense, they represented an industry slowly and inevitably sliding backward, with minimal prospects for regaining meaningful traction. Total revenues were down 2.4% to $739.6 million in the quarter, while advertising revenues fell 4.2%. Circulation revenues slid 1.3%, but the slide would have been greater if not for price hikes in several markets. Earnings per share were $0.10, one penny less than analysts' consensus.
But now, with advertisers turning from newspapers to online high-traffic sites, New York Times' management is diligently attempting to trim costs and restructure operations. In the process, it is steadily cutting staff -- many on the editorial side -- and consolidating locations.
Management also has announced plans to sell its nine network television stations. That group clearly is expendable, generating only about $150 million in annual revenues, or about 5% of the company's total. Its bottom-line contribution this quarter was about $0.03.
The difficulty for the Times and its shareholders is that online revenues, while likely to rise to $250 million this year, are still dwarfed by the core newspaper business. I sense that management would love to awaken to miraculously find Internet-related operations constituting the bulk of its business. While the company has been slow to leverage this shift, investors have watched their share price decline steadily from around $50 four years ago to slightly below $23 today.
As that share price withers further, rumors of a potential leveraged buyout, led by the controlling Sulzberger family, have become more commonplace. But a question dealing with that possibility was neatly sidestepped during Thursday's conference call.
The company is in the same boat with other newspaper publishers, including Tribune
For related newsprint Foolishness:
Their bigger rivals may make the headlines, but the stocks of Motley Fool Hidden Gems have the real stop-the-presses performance. Discover all of Tom Gardner and Bill Mann's superior small-cap selections with a free 30-day trial.
Fool contributor David Lee Smith still enjoys curling up with the Sunday New York Times -- and receiving comments at firstname.lastname@example.org. He doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned.