Decision Day is looming for Sirius
Regulators have spent the past nine months debating the proposed combination of the country's only two satellite radio operators. A recommendation might be made in the next few days that will either derail the merger or create a premium programming force with more than 16 million subscribers.
Several factors are tugging the Justice Department in different directions. Let's explore them quickly before I hand over the soapbox to you. Yes, you.
Just say no
Critics of the deal argue that the merger would transform a duopoly into a monopoly. Sirius and XM may not be the only satellite radio providers on the planet -- WorldSpace
Consolidation fears come into play, of course. If one company is watching over both brands, consumers may be denied lower prices, enhanced programming, and responsive customer service and other elements that are the logical byproducts of a competitive landscape.
Just say yes
Proponents of the deal argue that a chunk of the billions in realized synergies will be passed on to subscribers. In fact, XM and Sirius have already committed to rolling out low-priced plans and flexible programming packages within a year of the merger's completion.
Fans of the deal also point out that the marketplace has changed. The FCC may have shot down merger plans of DIRECTV
Back to you
What do you think? We Fools have added comment boxes to some articles to give you a soapbox to agree or disagree with the articles on the site. This is an incendiary topic, so feel free to chime in.
Why do you think the deal will happen? If it doesn't happen, will it matter to the market? How are you playing this as an investor?
Scroll to the bottom and kick in with your thoughts on this courtship that is barreling quickly to a resolution.
Once you're off the soapbox, check some more articles on the merger: