Tell me, what if you'd never sold a stock?
Would you have more money now, or less? I set out to answer that question myself this morning, and to back it up with some hard data. I chickened out.
I knew the answer. If I had never sold a single share of stock, I would be ... richer than I am today. How much richer? Much richer. I can't give you a precise figure, because I knew that once I saw it for myself, I would scream.
It gets worse and worse
I bought Yahoo!
"I sold Yahoo! back in 1997" is one of the most sickening things you'll ever have to admit to another investor. After all, since that first double, Yahoo! has doubled again ... many, many times.
I didn't flip the Google
You guessed it. I bought Stericycle for a few bucks in 1997 and sold it for around $10 the next year. Now, it's somewhere in the high-$50s. That, my friend, is what I call the most painful double of my career.
"So what did you do with the cash?"
I probably bought another stock, but do you think it did as well as Stericycle? Fat chance. I know I didn't have a better stock in mind when I dumped it. I don't recall buying a house or even furniture, either. (You'll see how this is relevant, believe it or not.)
No, I sold my meal ticket to book a nice gain. But what did I really "book"? Zip. You never do, unless you pull that money straight out of the market, which is not something you should consider now, especially if you're in your prime investing years.
That's right. Tempting as it is, I don't think you should try to time the market. A lot of folks claim to do it -- and a few actually seem to pull it off -- but not me. In fact, you might want to brace yourself, because I'm going to go one giant step further than that.
I barely believe in valuation
At least, not when it comes to selling. Sometimes a stock gets so cheap you have to buy it. Here at the Fool, folks got downright giddy when Apple
Now, our value guys are salivating over the mega caps. My favorite value hound, Admiral Philip Durell, has been eyeballing Sprint
Either way, valuation is well and good if you've got money to put to work, but the math gets dicey when it comes to selling -- especially growth stocks, and especially big winners.
The fact is, I've met some great stock pickers in my day, but not many great sellers. Come to think of it, I've never met a great seller.
Promise me you won't get too cute
Let me put it another way. I'm not surprised that my pal Tom Gardner and his crew at Motley Fool Hidden Gems have uncovered more than two dozen stocks that doubled over the past few years.
They work hard and stick to the fundamentals. Plus, they're fishing a rich pond. Wall Street isn't snooping around these smaller stocks yet, which creates inefficiencies and pent-up demand.
But just so you don't write me off as a Tom Gardner cheerleader, I'll let you in on a secret: I use Tom to lead me to undervalued small caps with big potential. When Tom tells us to sell, I typically don't listen -- and I probably won't in the future. Especially not if it's a winner. I never sell on valuation.
That's how tragedies happen
After all, market-timers tell you that buy-and-holders like us get wiped out in bad markets. But then you pull up chart after chart of "boring" widow and orphan stocks and what do you see? A gentle slope skyward. So how on Earth did anybody ever lose money on stocks like that? Good question.
Know what else looks like that? The Dow or the S&P 500, for that matter -- a.k.a. the market. Granted, when you zoom in, the ride looks bumpier, but the long-term trend is up. So how do you lose money in the market? Well, you either buy at the top in 2000 -- and only at the top in 2000 -- or you get cute and buy and sell along the way.
Consider this approach instead: Sell your winners when you want to buy a house, furniture, or other major purchase. Sell when you have too much in stocks and you want to buy some bonds, gold bars, or Dickensian village collectibles. Sell when you have too much in any one stock. But sell a stock on valuation alone at your own peril.
You don't have to go it alone
OK. Enough preaching. Like I said, when you join a service like Hidden Gems, smarter investors than I will tell you when to sell your big winners and lock in your gains. But the choice is yours.
And when Tom tells you to buy, you'll want to listen. After all, as of this morning, their recommendations are up 47% on average. That's compared with a downright decent 20% if you'd simply bought the S&P 500 instead. Is your money growing that fast?
It could be. If not, you should consider taking a free 30-day trial to Hidden Gems right now. This way, you can verify everything I've just told you about Tom and his team without risking a cent. If you don't like what you see, don't pay.
But whatever you decide, just promise me you won't get too cute. For a peek at Tom's top five picks for new money now, and to find out more about your special free trial, click here.
This article was originally published on July 22, 2005. It has been updated.
Fool writer Paul Elliott promises to keep you posted on Tom Gardner's progress at Motley Fool Hidden Gems. All picks and results are posted on the Hidden Gems website, which is all yours with a free trial. Paul doesn't own any stocks mentioned. Microsoft, Dell, and Sprint are Inside Value recommendations. Yahoo! and Dell are Stock Advisor picks. The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.
