Take a company that operates at the nexus of media and finance, and its earnings for the fourth quarter of 2007 are likely to turn out much like McGraw-Hill's
McGraw-Hill has been affected by fewer debt issuances because of the credit crunch in the finance sector and the steady slide of many companies in the media sector. For the quarter, it earned $140.6 million, or $0.43 per share, which is down 31% and 23% over the prior year, respectively. But if you take out a $0.08 restructuring charge, the company's per-share earnings for the most recent quarter would have come to $0.51. That is a penny less than the Wall Street dart throwers had anticipated.
Of its three operating segments, the most productive was the education unit, which produces all manner of school texts and professional educational materials. The unit is benefiting from a strong educational climate and has increased its revenues by 4.3% in the quarter, although it reported a small operating loss after restructuring charges (versus a small operating profit last year).
And then there's the financial services unit. The segment is broadly divided into Standard & Poor's Credit Market Services and the S&P Investment Services segment. Because of the steep decline during the quarter on the market services side -- mostly related to the mortgage and credit markets' messes -- the unit's revenues for the quarter slipped by 7.2%. And the operating profit for the unit was down 22.8%, after restructuring charges.
Finally, there's the information and media segment, which includes BusinessWeek, and J.D. Power and Associates, among other brands. This group is chugging along, but like most media entities, is doing so into a strong headwind. As such, while its revenues expanded by 3.6% during the quarter, its operating profit after restructuring charges fell by 6.1%.
At this time, results for the companies that can be included among McGraw-Hill's peers is incomplete. For instance, next week fellow ratings company Moody's
For my money, I think it best to remain on the sidelines and continue watching McGraw-Hill. With the market performing triple loop-de-loops almost daily and no end in sight to the oft-discussed credit crunch, it's difficult to be enthusiastic about the company's immediate future.
For related Foolishness:
Fool contributor David Lee Smith is an avid reader of BusinessWeek, but doesn't own shares in any company mentioned. He does welcome your questions or comments. The Fool has a widely published disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
The 3 Best Dividend Aristocrats of 2017
These three Dividend Aristocrats all returned more than 55% to shareholders.
3 Growth Stocks Worth Owning for the Next 50 Years
Three brand-name businesses with competitive advantages that can stand the test of time.
Snap vs. S&P Global: 3 Reasons I'm on Snap's Side
S&P Global's decision to bar Snap from inclusion in its most prominent indexes shows the increasingly arbitrary rules that govern the largest indices.