There's one investment strategy you won't read much about on Fool.com, even though many have tried it. In fact, Warren Buffett spent eight years working with it before discarding it as worthless.
What investment strategy is that? Technical analysis.
Invest like a lemming
Technical analysis is the practice of predicting where stocks will trade based on charts of historical pricing and volume information. There's a certain logic to it. Stocks trade based on supply and demand, which is greatly influenced by investors' attitudes about the stocks. The charts should reflect those attitudes and might predict where the individual stocks will go.
It's an attractive idea. Clorox
Technical analysis is a simple yet compelling strategy. You can see why Buffett spent years early in his career trying to master it.
An expensive mistake
But Buffett discovered one small problem. Technical analysis didn't work. He explained, "I realized that technical analysis didn't work when I turned the chart upside down and didn't get a different answer."
After eight years of trying, he concluded that it was the wrong way to invest. Then he focused on the teachings of Ben Graham, which stressed business fundamentals, finding a strategy that both made sense and, more importantly, worked.
Three simple rules
The billionaire discussed that strategy at the 2008 Berkshire Hathaway
- Buy stocks with a margin of safety.
- A stock is part of a business.
- The market is there to serve you, not instruct you.
The first lesson usually makes the headlines. It means that you should buy stocks for less than they're worth. But when Buffett talks about the second and third lessons, he's basically admitting that he wasted eight years of his investing life.
Buying a business
After all, thinking about a stock as part of a business is the opposite of what technical analysis is all about. Technical analysis focuses on trading securities. It doesn't matter whether the security is a share of Suncor Energy
In Graham's second lesson, stocks are far more than just pieces of paper or lines on graphs, and to understand them, you need to understand the business. If you're looking at Under Armour
Ways to serve man and woman
Similarly, when Buffett says the market isn't there to instruct, he's saying the movements in the market aren't telling you how to invest.
When Wells Fargo
When McDonald's hit $13 in 2003, the market was announcing that the Big Mac would end up in the Museum of Neat Ideas Gone Wrong, alongside the tapeworm diet, land wars in Asia, and Paris Hilton's home videos.
But in both cases, the market was wrong.
So, instead of listening to the market, Buffett seeks to take advantage of it. Sometimes, the market will offer to buy a stock for far more than it's actually worth. Other times, it'll offer you the chance to buy shares of a great company for far less than its fair value. An investor who understands the true value of a business will be able to profit when the market offers great companies on sale.
The Foolish bottom line
You can learn from Buffett's error -- don't focus on charts. Instead, understand businesses and seek excellent stocks that the market offers at low prices. These days, the market is particularly treacherous. Some stocks that seem cheap will turn out to be very expensive. Others that are simply beaten down by negativity will post amazing returns.
Our Motley Fool Inside Value team is working to take advantage of the situation, and we've identified several stocks we think will post some of those amazing returns. If you're interested in reading about them, click here for a 30-day free trial.
This article was first published June 16, 2008. It has been updated.
Fool contributor Richard Gibbons should not be used as a dessert topping. He has a beneficial interest in Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Under Armour. Berkshire is a Motley Fool Inside Value and Stock Advisor recommendation. Under Armour is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems and Rule Breakers pick. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters is a Rule Breakers selection. The Fool's disclosure policy bears an eerie resemblance to Charlie Munger