I love Visa
What worries me is the increasing disconnect between Visa's valuation and the grim reality facing global consumers. With shares priced for perfection at roughly 20 times forward earnings, there's little room for error and big expectations for future growth. Yet, yesterday's quarterly report shows that the glory days of unrelenting growth investors have been used to aren't entirely sustainable in this economy.
Net income for Visa's fiscal second quarter came in at $536 million, or $0.71 per share. That was a big increase over last year's period, which included a hefty one-time litigation provision related to a lawsuit with American Express
But that's where the good news ends. Not surprisingly, credit volume fell off a cliff, sliding 4.2% in the quarter. Debit made up for a lot of that shortfall, rising 5.6%, but it wasn't enough to curtail the bleeding, leaving Visa with its first decline in worldwide payment volume since becoming a public company. Have a look:
|
Period Ending |
Worldwide Payment Volume Growth |
|---|---|
|
December 31, 2008 |
(0.9%) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
12.4% |
|
June 30, 2008 |
15.2% |
|
March 31, 2008 |
19.1% |
There's a one-quarter lag in its payment volume reporting, so the most recent data doesn't portray early 2009, when economic conditions -- led by unemployment -- became considerably worse.
Hence you get a situation I've been warning about for a while now: Credit transactions are evaporating, and what slack debit can pick up isn't enough to stop declines in payment volume. Net-net, people are spending less, and that's the last thing investors counting on perpetual growth want to hear.
I suppose a healthy dose of cost cutting can keep earnings growth on a roll for a while, but is a 20-forward P/E multiple in the middle of the horrific recession truly appropriate for a company tied to a permanently spend-spooked consumer? Factor in massive cutbacks in credit lines from banks like Bank of America
Maybe you have a different take? I'd love to hear it. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comment section below.
For related Foolishness:
