It's Googlemania on Fool.com, where we aim to give you everything you need to know -- and then some -- about the search giant's impending initial public offering. Today, Bill Mann covers how the Dutch auction process will work, and Salim Haji offers up what it will take for Google to succeed. Enjoy.
In today's Motley Fool Take:
- The TiVo Paradox
- Discussion Board of the Day: TiVo
- palmOne Writes Off Xerox
- Shameless Plug: Free IBD!
- Steel's Staring Contest
- Quote of Note
- More on Fool.com Today
By Rick Aristotle Munarriz (TMF Edible)
Would you rather be rich or popular? That's the question that TiVo
Last night, the company reported impressive growth -- everywhere short of the bottom line. TiVo tacked on 264,000 new users, most coming as a result of a partnership with DirecTV
So, you say you love TiVo? You can't live without it and want to back that adoration with equity ownership? You're smitten, bought a ring, and want to make a Mrs. out of Miss Congeniality? You're not alone. Our own Motley Fool Stock Advisor singled out the stock months ago. However, you may want to hold off on setting that date until the company proves it can be profitable.
The April quarter bears that out with a cruel paradox. The net loss widened even as TiVo's per-share loss shrank from $0.12 to $0.11. How so? Well, shares outstanding zoomed from 64 million to 80 million. Want to throw some salt into the open wound of that cruel paradox? Even though diluted shares rose by nearly 25%, cash, assets, and equity have all fallen.
You can take comfort in knowing that you can buy TiVo cheaper today than when institutional investors acquired 8 million new shares at $9.30 earlier this year -- or you can cock a brow and wonder why that's the case, and realize that the devil is in the diluted details.
The saving grace is that TiVo does expect to turn the corner and produce sustainable profitability by the end of the next fiscal year. If so, that would go a long way toward overcoming the need to print new shares at an alarming rate. TiVo's got such a great story to tell. Ask any subscriber, and you'll hear that it's got a great service to sell, too.
Great! But the company has to go that extra mile and dig itself out of the red if it wants to carve the same growth path as more successful Stock Advisor pioneers like Netflix
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has been happy with his TiVo for a couple of years. He owns shares in Netflix.
Are you a TiVo subscriber? Do you swear by the service or were you left expecting more from the experience? What about the company's competition? All this and more -- in the TiVo discussion board. Only on Fool.com.
palmOne Writes Off Xerox
By Seth Jayson
It has taken years, and in the process, handheld computer maker palmOne
At issue was the handheld's very soul, the quick and useful Graffiti system of shorthand by which users enter text into the device. Xerox filed a lawsuit seven years ago, alleging infringement on its patent for "unistroke" symbols. The litigation haunted palmOne's steps until the judgment, though that seems odd since the spinoff PalmSource
The dismissal came because the judge believed palmOne's argument for "prior art." In a nutshell, it stated that similar shorthand recognition systems were in existence prior to Xerox's claim, and so the latter's patent should never have been granted. The ruling shows the danger in patent litigation. If you lose, you can leave the courtroom with much less than you had going in.
What does this mean for palmOne shareholders? Not much, I would argue. Sure, it's nice not to have the threat of damages or future royalty payments hanging over the company, but shareholders have long been numbed to this particular fright. The future looks cloudy. Sales -- not to mention the reporting -- have been less than stellar. Competition is stiff, and the firm's product line, outside of the Treo phone/PDA combo, hasn't sparkled. My own house was Palm-powered for years, but we recently jumped ship for the excellent and inexpensive offerings from Sony
Earlier this month, the stock took a run on some far-fetched speculation that Dell
Increase your investing knowledge on a daily basis with IBD. Sign up for 10 free issues of Investor's Business Daily and get The Motley Fool User's Guide to IBD on us. There's no obligation. Nothing to cancel. No hassle. Just a perk for being a Fool.
Steel's Staring Contest
By Rich Smith
Over the past few months, I have written several times about the amazing profits being racked up by some (but not all) of America's steel companies. Firms such as Reliance Steel
In fact, some of these companies have felt so much in control of their destiny, that they threw caution to the wind and risked the ire of America's famously litigious corporate citizens by imposing surcharges on their products. This, even when their supply contracts with their customers clearly specified set prices for their goods.
Big mistake. Huge mistake.
So learned Dutch steel maker Ispat International's
Moreover, Whirlpool's TRO win bodes ill for two companies imposing similar surcharges on steel and steel parts supplied to General Motors
Were I a betting man, I would be placing my money on both Whirlpool and GM being the ultimate winners in their respective lawsuits. As for the losers, those would include not just Steel Dynamics, Textron, and Ispat, but all the other steel makers (and shareholders in those steel makers) currently signed to supply contracts. They would be forced by court judgments, or fear of court judgments, to drop their surcharges and excess profits and agree to be compensated at the previously agreed rates.
Fool contributor Rich Smith owns no shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.
"If I have lost confidence in myself, I have the universe against me." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
In other news:
- Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Blockbuster
- Hey! Don't Diss Daktronics
- JoS. A. Bank's Empty Suit
- Sports Authority: Fit or Fat?
For a list of all our stories from today, see our Today's Headlines page.