If you're invested in stocks, you're probably not looking forward to seeing your first-quarter financial statements -- even with the recent rally we've seen. If you're already retired, though, you might well be on the verge of panic as you watch your life savings dropping in value.
Falling markets are tough for any investor to endure. When you're just starting out, it's painful to watch any of your hard-earned savings disappear. But when you're depending on your savings to provide you with income for the rest of your life, you can't afford to take the same risks younger investors can. That makes any losses you suffer even harder to bear.
No matter how much you've managed to save, the universal fear among retirees is running out of money. But by anticipating the ups and downs in various markets, you can keep the odds in your favor.
Can you trust the 4% rule?
Those who've read the Fool's Rule Your Retirement newsletter service know about the 4% rule. In simple terms, based on past historical market returns, a portfolio of stocks and bonds has always been able to support annual withdrawals of 4% of the initial portfolio value for 30 years or more. So if you have $1 million when you retire, you could take withdrawals of $40,000 each year, adjusting upward for inflation every year, and expect to have money left 30 years later
That makes plenty of sense during good times. With stocks returning roughly 9%-10% per year on average, a 4% withdrawal seems quite conservative when the market is rising.
But when stocks fall, it's hard to believe you can sustain withdrawals based on a nest egg whose value is dropping. If you're unlucky enough to retire at exactly the wrong time, it can take some fortitude to count on having history repeat itself.
The worst-case scenario?
Consider, for example, someone who retired at the top of the market in 2000. A Rule Your Retirement article from the newsletter's archives showed that depending on exactly what investments you made, following the 4% rule could have left you looking at big losses. With the S&P down just about 50% from its March 2000 highs, a portfolio with 75% invested in an S&P 500 index fund and 25% in a short-term bond fund would have lost around a third of its value even before taking withdrawals into account, and those annual 4% withdrawals -- based on the original balance -- would now represent much larger percentage of your remaining assets.
That's not too surprising, given how lots of companies have seen their stocks perform lately. Apple
The 4% rule was designed with these sorts of historical drops in mind. After all, the market has gone through long stretches of so-so performance before. Even so, counting on history to repeat itself isn't necessarily reassuring after you've seen a big chunk of your net worth go up in smoke.
Spreading out the risk
But there are things you can do to avoid that worst-case scenario. A more diversified portfolio that the RYR article discussed included more than just the large-cap domestic stocks you'll find in the S&P 500 -- and it performed much better over the same time period with less risk. By including small-cap stocks such as Take-Two Interactive
Unfortunately, they've still been hit hard by the recent bear market, which hasn't provided many safe havens for investors. But over time, owning different types of stocks should help smooth out returns.
You shouldn't keep all of your eggs in one basket, especially during retirement. By building a diversified retirement portfolio that includes assets that will do well when others are performing poorly, you can avoid the anxiety that comes from down markets that come soon after you retire.
More on securing a happy retirement: