Most investors are painfully aware that the past 10 years have been pretty dismal ones for the average Joe and Jane. The "Lost Decade" is aptly named, seeing as the S&P 500 wound up basically flat over that time, although it endured several roller-coaster rides over the duration. As you might expect, some money managers destroyed an inordinate amount of wealth over the past decade.
According to a recently released report from Morningstar, one mutual fund complex was responsible for the largest fund-related destruction of wealth over the past 10 years. Janus Capital Group's
Of course, it may not be completely fair to single out Janus as a wealth destroyer. Fundholders at Putnam Investments didn't fare much better, losing a collective $46.4 billion during the same time period. Alliance Bernstein lost $11.4 billion, while Invesco AIM lost $10.1 billion. And many Janus funds have since rebounded, performing rather well in the latter half of the decade under study. And while there's no changing the amount of wealth that was destroyed by some fund families in the opening decade of the new millennium, there are a few important lessons investors can take away from these events.
Learning from the past
The biggest reason why Janus landed at the top of the money-losing charts was a simple one: During the late 1990s the shop was pretty heavily growth-oriented. Most Janus funds were heavily invested in technology stocks like Microsoft
That's the danger in following trends too closely; eventually you're going to be on the wrong side of the market. Janus got into trouble by betting too aggressively on high-priced tech names with little regard for valuation. Investors should exercise caution not to blindly chase performance or run after the hottest-performing investment just because it's done well in the past. That's a surefire recipe for disappointment, since investors typically arrive late to the party and miss most of the early gains. (Gold bugs, take note!)
Secondly, this is another lesson on the importance of diversification -- not only between stocks and bonds or among market capitalizations and countries, but among fund families as well. Unless you're tied into a single-fund-family retirement plan, make sure that your fund choices span across several fund shops.
Some firms tend to be more value-oriented and may invest in dividend-producing names like ExxonMobil
Lastly, when it comes to mutual fund investing, it's not enough just to sock money away in a random fund and hope that it does well. History has shown that most actively managed funds don't beat the market consistently over long periods of time. You need the best funds in the bunch -- the ones that have the best odds of making you money over the long run.
In fact, that same Morningstar report also listed the three biggest wealth creators over the past decade -- the fund shops that have made the most money for their shareholders. Those same three fund families are featured in the Fool's Rule Your Retirement investment service. As a special feature, we've published several fund family reports detailing which funds you should buy from some of the biggest fund shops around, and which funds you should avoid.
With your free 30-day trial, you'll not only get access to some of the best personal financial planning and retirement advice around, but you'll also get all of our fund family reports, including those of the "Big Three" wealth creators. There's no telling exactly what the next decade has in store for the stock market, but by sticking to your long-term investment plan and investing with the best money-generating fund firms around, odds are good the next 10 years will be very profitable ones for your portfolio.
Amanda Kish is the Fool's resident fund advisor for the Rule Your Retirement newsletter. At the time of publication, she did not own any of the companies mentioned herein. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. Procter & Gamble is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Microsoft. The Fool owns shares of Procter & Gamble. Click here to find out more about the Fool's disclosure policy.