iShares Silver Trust (NYSEMKT:SLV) and SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEMKT:GLD) both offer exposure to physical precious metals, but GLD comes with a slightly lower expense ratio, a larger asset base, and a less volatile historical risk profile.
Both SLV and GLD are designed to give investors direct access to the price movements of silver and gold, respectively, through physically backed trusts. This comparison looks at costs, performance, risk, and portfolio composition to help investors decide whether silver or gold exposure may better fit their portfolio objectives.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | SLV | GLD |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | IShares | SPDR |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| 1-yr return (as of 2026-03-31) | 119.9% | 49.3% |
| Beta | 0.53 | 0.20 |
| AUM | $35.7 billion | $155.1 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
GLD is slightly more affordable on annual fees and dwarfs SLV in assets under management, which may appeal to investors seeking greater liquidity for large trades. Yield is not a factor for either fund, as both focus on physical metals and do not pay dividends.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | SLV | GLD |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -42.45% | -21.03% |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $2,943 | $2,656 |
SLV delivered a sharper five-year return, but also saw steeper declines at its worst point compared to GLD. This highlights silver's higher volatility, while gold has provided a smoother ride for investors over the same period.
What's inside
GLD is a single-asset fund with 100% exposure to physical gold bullion, tracked through a transparent trust structure. It has been operating for over 21 years and is among the largest commodity ETFs globally, with no sector tilts or quirks—just direct gold price tracking. There are no underlying equity or bond holdings, and the fund does not distribute dividends.
SLV is also fully concentrated in basic materials, specifically silver, and does not hold equities or other assets. Like GLD, it is structured to mirror spot metal prices as closely as possible and carries no additional risk factors or structural complexities.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investors
Gold and silver get grouped together as precious metals, but they don't behave the same way — and understanding why matters before choosing between these two funds. Gold's price is driven primarily by investor sentiment — fear, inflation expectations, and central bank demand are the dominant levers, with industrial use playing a much smaller role than it does for silver. That's what makes GLD a classic safe haven — when markets get rocky, gold tends to hold its value better than most assets because investors treat it as a store of value, though it's not immune to rising interest rates or a strengthening dollar.
Silver is different. It carries all of gold's safe haven appeal but also has significant industrial demand — solar panels, electronics, and EV components all rely on it. That ties silver's price to economic growth cycles in a way gold's isn't. When the economy is expanding and industrial production is strong, silver can outperform gold significantly. When growth slows or demand drops, it tends to fall harder. That's the real story behind SLV's stronger five-year return and steeper drawdowns — it's not just a more volatile version of gold, it's responding to two different sets of forces at once.
For investors, the choice comes down to what you're trying to do. GLD is a cleaner hedge against uncertainty. SLV is a bet on both precious metals sentiment and global industrial demand. Neither is wrong — they just serve different purposes in a portfolio.
