Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Free Article Join Over 1 Million Premium Members And Get More In-Depth Stock Guidance and Research

What Does "Suicide Squad" Mean for Time Warner?

By Keith Noonan - Aug 9, 2016 at 12:22PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Warner's "Suicide Squad" is the biggest August opener ever, but the company's vision for the DC Extended Universe is still confused.

Image source: Time Warner.

Time Warner's ( TWX ) Suicide Squad exploded at theaters across the globe on it's opening evening, delivering domestic ticket sales of $135 million and an overseas take of $132 million, setting new records for an August opener. That's a great start -- especially for a movie with so much riding on it. However, the overall implications for Warner's comic book movie universe are less clear.

Suicide Squad overcame poor reviews thanks to enticing characters and a great ad campaign, but it's now the third movie in Warner's high-stakes DC Extended Universe (DCEU) to receive unfavorable receptions from audiences and critics. The DCEU is the company's most valuable film franchise, and the series is in trouble despite still having the power to pack theaters on opening weekends. 

Warner's DCEU is going through an identity crisis

The success of Disney's ( DIS 2.84% ) Marvel films established the high bar for comic book movies and initiated an industrywide shift to an even more franchise-centric production model. Across 13 entries, the average worldwide gross for a Marvel Comic Universe (MCU) film sits at nearly $790 million and the total ticket haul for the series stands at over $10.2 billion. Warner set out to replicate this success while also distancing DCEU from Marvel films by way of endowing its universe with darker visuals and stories, but, by now, it's clear that there were major problems with the vision and execution for the unfolding franchise.

Warner's expanded superhero movie-universe kicked off with 2013's Man of Steel, but Suicide Squad's box office and critical reception are framed in relation to this year's Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. The clashing superheros movie was put forth as the launching pad for future DC projects before ultimately proving to be a commercial and critical disappointment. Like Suicide SquadBatman v. Superman exploded out of the gates and scored up $166 million in its domestic opening and more than $400 million in its worldwide opening weekend, but poor reviews weighed on the film and resulted in weaker-than-expected ticket sales of roughly $870 million.

Batman v. Superman was dogged for its overly dark tone and aesthetics. To counter this, Warner appears to have scrambled to bring the marketing and final cut of Suicide Squad closer in line with the fun and irreverence found in Disney's MCU films or Twenty-First Century Fox's breakout hit, Deadpool. Reports suggest that Suicide Squad went through a series of drastic edits in order to deliver a commercially pleasing product and one that shifted the tone of the overall DCEU to less brooding terrain. The end result is a picture that both critics and audiences are describing as "disjointed."

Is Suicide Squad a hit or a miss?

Suicide Squad's explosive opening indicates brand resilience following a disappointing performance for its immediate DC predecessor, but there's a good chance that audience reception will also be a limiting factor in Suicide Squad's overall run. Further complicating Squad's prospects, the picture looks to be constrained by not screening in China, which only allows 34 non-domestic films to screen each year. Batman v. Superman performed poorly in Chinese theaters, scoring approximately $100 million in ticket sales, but missing out on the world's second-biggest movie market entirely would be a significant setback, and one that Warner needs to remedy with future entries in order to avoid leaving money on the table.

Without a Chinese release, Suicide Squad looks to be tracking for a worldwide performance in the range of $700 million. Given the film's reported $175 million production budget and big ad campaign the picture won't be a big earner for Warner.

Quality and marketability concerns have already led Warner to shuffle plans and personnel for the DC Universe, creating a new unit dubbed DC Films and reportedly moving away from the vision of original overseer (and Batman v. Superman director) Zack Snyder. The franchise now appears to be moving closer in line with Disney's Marvel films, as evidenced by the marketing for Suicide Squad and 2017's Justice League. Big changes are necessary to get the overall project back on track.

Smaller pics might struggle without big names

Suicide Squad's strong opening performance reaffirms that the DC Comics universe is ripe with strong characters and premises, and highlights the possible impact of a stellar ad campaign. But where Squad benefited from a potentially dynamite setup with Will Smith and Margot Robbie turning in marketable performances as Deadshot and Harley Quinn, other subsequent franchise entries might have a tougher time.

Upcoming DC films including Wonder WomanCyborg, and Aquaman probably won't have the star power that helped Batman v. Superman and Suicide Squad, and counting on the same type of marketing home run that drove the latter is a dubious proposition. Much of the brilliance in Disney's MCU model resides in its ability to get audiences interested in lesser-known heroes such as Ant-Man, but it doesn't seem like Warner is succeeding in creating similar leverage. 

With large production and marketing budgets involved and eight more films in the franchise scheduled through 2020, the poor quality of its first three universe entries could represent a significant missed opportunity for Warner. 

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis – even one of our own – helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

The Walt Disney Company Stock Quote
The Walt Disney Company
$150.37 (2.84%) $4.15
Time Warner Inc. Stock Quote
Time Warner Inc.

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 12/06/2021.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Our Most Popular Articles

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with the Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from the Motley Fool's premium services.