At Intel's (NASDAQ:INTC) Technology and Manufacturing (TMG) Day event, the company spent a good deal of time talking about how it's aiming to build a "foundry franchise."

That is, Intel -- a company that has traditionally designed and built its own chips -- wants to leverage its chip manufacturing expertise and its expensive chip manufacturing plants to generate additional revenue by building chips for third-party chip manufacturers.

A wafer of chips.

Image source: Intel.

Intel pegs the total addressable market for what it calls "leading edge" chip technology (28-nanometer technology and below) at about $23 billion.

That said, just because a market is large and a company has ambitions to play in it doesn't mean much if a company can't capture a significant portion of said market.

During a question-and-answer session at Intel's TMG day, one analyst asked Intel executives about its long-term ambitions in this market and whether it would build chips for competitors (as some of the foundry total addressable market overlaps with Intel's own product lines).

Let's look at what Intel executive Murthy Renduchintala had to say.

No publicly stated ambitions

Unfortunately, Renduchintala declined to provide long-term market share goals/ambitions for Intel's foundry business. He did say the following, though: "I think specific ambitions, we haven't declared any beyond the fact that I think that there are strategic partnerships and co-learning that could be available to [Intel] that could be mutually beneficial both to the internal product businesses of Intel and to, as well as, essentially providing a degree of extension of our foundry capability for other relationships."

Considering that Intel isn't generating any meaningful revenue from its contract chip business today, any targets that Intel puts out today probably wouldn't be all that credible, anyway.

Will Intel build chips for competitors?

Renduchintala didn't directly answer the question about potentially building chips for competing chipmakers. However, he did provide something of an indirect answer.

"I don't think we're setting ourselves up to be a general-purpose foundry," Renduchintala said. "We're really looking at strategic partnerships that essentially deliver win-win arrangements both for Intel and their customers and a degree of technical cooperation that's part of that win-win story."

This chart shows Intel's view of the contract chip manufacturing total addressable market -- $23 billion total in 2016, with half of that coming from 28-nano tech while the other half being split between 14/16/20-nano tech.

Image source: Intel.

It's not hard to read this as a "no." After all, if Intel really has technology that could fundamentally improve the competitiveness of a product that directly competes with significant Intel-designed products, then would it really be a "win-win" to enable that competitor?

Of course not! It would be much smarter for Intel to leverage whatever manufacturing technology advantage that it must make its own products better to defend market-share against challengers to its leadership position while at the same time trying to grow its market share in areas where it's a relatively small player today.

An example of a "win-win" would be if Intel worked with a third-party chipmaker that builds chips for a market that Intel doesn't serve today.

For example, Intel doesn't really participate in the tablet/smartphone applications processor market today. So, a "win-win" for Intel would be to collaborate up with a company that builds smartphone chips and build a large portion of that company's chips.

That's what the company is doing with mobile chip vendor Spreadtrum today

If Intel's technology really provides a performance and/or cost benefit compared to other technologies, then the potential customer wins and, of course, Intel would win (since it wouldn't otherwise derive any revenue from those smartphone chip sales).

The challenge that Intel faces is that the competition in this market is quite strong and Intel's chip manufacturing competitors in this market have spent years building tight relationships with the major mobile chipmakers. Breaking those bonds won't be easy.

Foolish takeaway

At the end of the day, investors shouldn't bet on any serious near-to-medium term revenue from Intel's contract chip division -- it'll be a while before the money starts flowing, if it ever does.

Keep an eye on the progress that Intel makes here, though. If the public starts to get clear signs that Intel is gaining traction with major mobile chipmakers, then that'll be the time to start thinking about the potential revenue and profit contributions to Intel from such business.

Until then, though, I wouldn't factor in any meaningful upside from these efforts into any potential financial models.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.