When Tesla's (TSLA +2.59%) SolarCity was independent and growing quickly, the company's business was driven by the rapidly falling cost of installing solar panels. Not only were panels themselves getting cheaper, but companies were becoming more efficient selling and installing systems, lowering labor costs along the way.
But the last two years has seen residential solar costs flatten. And with Tesla de-emphasizing its solar business, Vivint Solar (VSLR +0.00%) and Sunrun (RUN +4.24%) are the two biggest installers to watch. If current trends continue, they may struggle to lower costs in 2017 and that could limit opportunities for growth.
Image source: Getty Images.
Where are the cost reductions?
Below is a chart of the total cost to build and install solar systems for Vivint Solar. You can see that costs have fluctuated over the last five quarters, but have generally been between $2.85 and $3.00 per watt. Notice that installations costs have gone down, but sales and marketing and administrative costs have gone up as sales to early adopters have dried up.
Image source: Vivint Solar.
A similar trend shows up at Sunrun. Overall, its costs have been flat over the last four quarters and overall installation costs are up as well.
Image source: Sunrun.
The fact that solar costs haven't come down considerably in the past year is notable because solar module costs dropped by about one-third between the second quarter of 2016 and the end of 2016 (or $0.15 per watt). That alone should have helped reduce costs, but it didn't. A major reason is that residential solar installers are spending more than ever to acquire customers.
Why cutting costs is such a big deal
The fact that solar costs aren't coming down rapidly doesn't bode well for future growth of the national installers. They need costs to decline to move into markets that aren't as sunny or electricity costs aren't as high as places like Hawaii, California, or Massachusetts.
In particular, states like Florida and Texas should be growth markets, but they have much lower utility electricity costs of 10.5 cents/kWh and 8.7 cents/kWh, which is much lower than a state like California at 15.4 cents/kWh. High installation costs will limit the market. That makes the flat-lining costs troubling for national installers.
Rethinking residential solar
The cost trends you see above are also indicative of a changing residential solar market for investors. Ever since the rooftop solar industry started to emerge as a viable product, it was dominated by companies with scale and low costs from the buying power scale brought, despite the fact that they were installing commodity products. But over the past two years, scale has become a hindrance.
Local and regional installers have gained market share since early 2016 because they are no longer at a component cost disadvantage and they have a lower cost base than national companies. They don't have the overhead of sales and administrative staff, often operating a small shop with a few crews. And a small installer can sell most systems on referrals, lowering customer acquisition costs.
Product differentiation is also something small installers are having some success with. SunPower's (SPWR +0.00%) high-efficiency solar panels are gaining market share and its model to sell through local and regional installers gives it more flexibility as market conditions change (see Nevada's solar turmoil).
Digital sales will also need to play a bigger role, which could help lower overall installation costs. But I think it's clear that the low-hanging fruit, in terms of both cost cuts and customers wanting to go solar, has been picked. And companies are going to have to differentiate on something other than cost alone.
