Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Apple Inc. Probably Didn't Tell Us the Truth About This iPhone 8 and 8 Plus Feature

By Ashraf Eassa - Oct 5, 2017 at 7:41PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The "new" Retina HD displays on Apple's iPhone 8 and 8 Plus appear to be the same ones from the prior-generation iPhone 7 and 7 Plus.

When Apple (AAPL 0.29%) introduced the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, it explicitly said the liquid crystal displays used in the devices were "new."

At the time, I said I was skeptical that the displays were new. Of course, Apple did add a new technology that it dubs True Tone that allows the displays on the phones to adjust color temperature and brightness based on the ambient lighting of their surroundings.

This technology, as I've written recently, really is a game changer and easily one of my favorite features of the iPhone 8 Plus. It dramatically improves the effective display quality and is a feature that, once seen, can't be unseen.

Apple's iPhone 8 Plus on the left and its iPhone 8 on the right.

Image source: Apple.

However, thanks to some new test results from, it appears that the display panels themselves aren't new at all -- they're basically the same ones found on the prior-generation iPhone 7 and 7 Plus.

Here's the proof.

The proof is in the display performance

According to NotebookCheck's testing, the display on the iPhone 8 Plus performs no better than the display on the prior-generation iPhone 7 Plus.

In fact, NotebookCheck's numbers show slight regressions in brightness, contrast, grayscale accuracy, gamma performance, and white point accuracy compared with the results exhibited by the site's iPhone 7 Plus test sample.

The only area in which the iPhone 8 Plus's display pulls ahead of the iPhone 7 Plus' is in color accuracy, but the displays are both so color accurate and the difference between them so negligible, it's essentially a wash.

Now, to be clear, I don't think Apple simply made "new but worse" displays for the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus. Instead, what NotebookCheck's results show is that the differences in display performance between the iPhone 7 Plus and 8 Plus essentially come down to standard manufacturing variance.

Is this dishonest marketing?

On one hand, I wouldn't feel right giving Apple's marketing department too much flak for its use of the word "new." The True Tone display functionality does improve the user experience far more tangibly than slightly more color accurate or slightly brighter displays would've done, particularly since the displays on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were already nothing short of excellent.

On the other, I don't think the use of the word "new" in conjunction with the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus displays is totally honest, either.

To Apple's credit, the company doesn't make any false claims with respect to key specifications of the displays on these devices. On Apple's website, the company quotes the same peak brightness levels and contrast ratio ratings that it did for the prior-generation iPhone 7 and 7 Plus.

If Apple wanted to have been truly transparent, though, it should've said something along the lines of "We've taken our Retina HD displays, which are renowned for their brightness and color accuracy, and we've added a feature that we know you won't want to live without -- our True Tone technology."

An economic silver lining

Though it's disappointing that Apple didn't build better display panels for the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, there is a silver lining to recycling what are essentially the same panels from the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus: cost. 

The displays on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were truly new when they were introduced; they delivered much higher brightness than their predecessors, industry-leading color accuracy, and support for wide-color. 

I suspect that at first, those displays were relatively expensive to manufacture, as is often the case with new technologies, but over the course of the iPhone 7-series cycle, manufacturing costs came down. 

Those lower costs probably allowed Apple to add features such as wireless charging, glass backs, and improved cameras to the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus without significantly increasing its own costs or the prices it asks for them. 


Ashraf Eassa has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Apple. The Motley Fool has the following options: long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple and short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Apple Inc. Stock Quote
Apple Inc.
$165.35 (0.29%) $0.48

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/09/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.