Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Is This Why Intel Corp.'s Chip Manufacturing Tech Is Late?

By Ashraf Eassa - Oct 27, 2017 at 11:23AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

This Fool debunks a popular myth about Intel's business.

It's no secret that chip giant Intel's (INTC 0.32%) upcoming 10-nanometer chip manufacturing technology has seen significant delays. 

The technology, which was supposed to go into mass production by the end of 2015 to support product releases in 2016, is now set to go into production later this year with shipments ramping up during the first half of 2018, according to Intel. 

These delays not only held back Intel's contract chip manufacturing ambitions, but it also led to delays in Intel's products, which hurt Intel's competitiveness in the marketplace

An Intel desktop processor.

Image source: Intel.

Naturally, this state of affairs invites discussion among industry enthusiasts and investors alike. One person tweeted out the following regarding decisions by Intel's CEO Brian Krzanich (BK): 

In response, another user said this: 

That answer isn't quite correct. Here's why. 

Financials 101

It's true that Intel has a significant amount of debt, especially as it has needed to borrow to fund two major acquisitions. However, having a lot of debt doesn't mean that a company doesn't have the ability to invest. 

A company's ability to invest in future technologies and products is largely a function of its revenue, its gross profit margin percentage, and its desired profitability targets. 

Putting this into more concrete terms, last year Intel generated $59.4 billion in net revenue and enjoyed a 60.9% gross profit margin percentage. This means that Intel sold $59.4 billion worth of stuff that cost $24.73 billion to produce, leaving it with nearly $36.2 billion in gross profit. 

Unfortunately for Intel, gross profit doesn't tell the whole story. Those sales wouldn't happen if Intel didn't pay people to develop those products, nor would those sales continue into the future if it didn't keep paying people to develop those products. 

On top of that, just making products doesn't mean that they'll sell. A lot of work (and money) goes into marketing these products to both end users and to partners.

Last year, Intel's research and development spending (in other words, costs associated with making new products and technologies) came in at $12.74 billion, and its marketing, general, and administrative costs were $8.39 billion. Deducting those two values from the gross profit number I mentioned earlier gives operating income, which came in at $12.87 billion. After taxes and other factors, Intel's net income for the year was $10.32 billion. 

Tying it all back to chip manufacturing tech

Notice that in the discussion above, Intel's debt load didn't come up. The fact of the matter is that Intel generates so much net profit that a debt load of $28 billion is quite manageable, especially as Intel's financial health and creditworthiness allows it to borrow money at low rates. The debt load isn't the problem. 

If Intel wanted to increase its spending on chip manufacturing technology, it could do it. That increase could come at the expense of net income, or Intel could cut spending in less essential areas to divert resources to chip manufacturing technology. 

On top of that, I'm not convinced that Intel isn't spending a lot on chip manufacturing technology development. For some perspective, Intel's main manufacturing competitor -- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (NYSE: TSM) -- spends less than $3 billion annually on research and development. 

TSM Research and Development Expense (TTM) Chart

TSM Research and Development Expense (TTM) data by YCharts.

In 2012, Intel said that it spent more than $2 billion per year on chip manufacturing technology development, a figure that has no doubt risen substantially since then. So, I don't think Intel's issues necessarily stem from spending too little. 

Instead, it seems more likely that Intel's chip technology development organization isn't making the best use of the substantial resources that it is given, pointing to potential issues with the leadership of that organization. 

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Intel Corporation Stock Quote
Intel Corporation
$37.41 (0.32%) $0.12

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 07/01/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.