Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Facebook Inc.'s In-House AI Chip Is Bad News for Intel Corp.'s Nervana

By Ashraf Eassa - Apr 23, 2018 at 5:05PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Intel's bet on Nervana Systems looks like another dud.

In 2016, chip giant Intel (INTC -2.43%) acquired artificial intelligence chip start-up Nervana Systems. Nervana's technology was supposed to allow Intel to compete against graphics giant NVIDIA (NVDA -3.97%) in the market for processors that handle the training of neural networks. 

According to Intel, Nervana's dedicated neural network training chips were slated to provide "unprecedented compute density at an order of magnitude more computing power than today's state of the art [graphics processing units]."

Intel Nervana Neural Network Processor

Image source: Intel.

Late last year, Intel announced that it would begin shipping its first Nervana Engine by the end of 2017 and that it was "thrilled to have Facebook (META -1.01%) in close collaboration sharing technical insights as we bring this new generation of new AI hardware to market." 

Just a few months later, Bloomberg reported that Facebook is working to develop its own hardware, likely for artificial intelligence and machine-learning workloads. 

Here's why this could spell trouble for Intel's Nervana efforts. 

Why build your own chips?

While a giant like Facebook can certainly afford the expense of building its own chips, the reality is that it's a non-trivial undertaking. Facebook isn't in the business of building and selling chips to customers -- it's interested in making sure that the vast data center infrastructure that supports its platforms is as efficient as possible to keep its total cost of operating as low as possible. 

If a third-party company like, say, Intel is willing to do the work to build great solutions for this market (especially if it'd be hard to replicate the performance/efficiency of the third party solution), then it makes sense to simply use that third-party solution. Moreover, when there are many chip vendors vying to build the best solutions possible, a buyer like Facebook is usually in good shape in terms of hardware pricing, too, as competition naturally brings lower prices. 

It generally makes sense for a company to build its own chips in the following scenarios:

  • A company thinks it can do a better job of building a product tailored to its own requirements than any third party could.
  • A company wants a chip developed to run proprietary algorithms/techniques that it doesn't want to share with a third party for competitive reasons. 

Although it's conceivable that the second point is a key factor in driving Facebook to explore building its own chips, my guess -- based on the fact that Facebook gave Intel permission to name drop it in the Nervana chip press release last year -- is that it's more of the first one.

Indeed, if Intel's Nervana chip is under-performing relative to the company's lofty claims (something that Facebook developing its own chips has me wondering about), and if the other dedicated machine-learning chip start-ups (there are a lot of them out there these days) can't deliver either, then it wouldn't be surprising for Facebook to think that its best chance of getting the hardware it needs is to build that hardware itself. 

Who wins, here?

Facebook may be designing its own chips, but it'll need a third party to manufacture them. While Intel has advertised chip manufacturing services of its own in the past, those efforts don't seem to have gained much traction.

I believe, then, that if Facebook is successful in deploying its own artificial intelligence/machine-learning chip, it'll likely tap contract chip manufacturing giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM -3.10%) to manufacture the chips (since TSMC's manufacturing technology is arguably the best in the industry, and its track record is superb). 

Such orders wouldn't be a game changer for TSMC -- Facebook's order volumes for such a chip wouldn't be anywhere near those of, say, a mobile processor or even a merchant graphics processor -- but it'd be incremental revenue over the long term -- always a good thing.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Facebook and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Intel Corporation Stock Quote
Intel Corporation
INTC
$34.52 (-2.43%) $0.86
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Stock Quote
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
TSM
$85.21 (-3.10%) $-2.73
NVIDIA Corporation Stock Quote
NVIDIA Corporation
NVDA
$170.86 (-3.97%) $-7.07
Meta Platforms, Inc. Stock Quote
Meta Platforms, Inc.
META
$168.53 (-1.01%) $-1.72

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
379%
 
S&P 500 Returns
123%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/09/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.