Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Is Fluor Stock a Buy After Last Week's Sell-Off? 1 Analyst Thinks So

By Rich Smith – Updated May 9, 2018 at 12:11PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Merrill Lynch pounces on down-and-out Fluor.

Every day, Wall Street analysts upgrade some stocks, downgrade others, and "initiate coverage" on a few more. But do these analysts even know what they're talking about? Today, we're taking one high-profile Wall Street pick and putting it under the microscope...

Shares of Fluor (FLR 1.84%) got devastated after earnings last week.

Analysts had been expecting the engineering and construction titan to report $0.77 per share in profit for fiscal Q1. When Fluor reported a $0.13-per-share loss instead, investors revolted -- sending Fluor stock down 22% in a day (and down a bit more in the days that followed). What goes down sometimes comes back up, however, and we're seeing that happen in early trading today, as Fluor shares get back up off the floor (sorry, I couldn't resist) and climb higher on the back of an upgrade from Merrill Lynch.

Here's what you need to know.

Nuclear power plant in a field of flowers

Fluor helps energy companies build power plants (among other things). But if nobody's building power plants, that's bad news for Fluor. Image source: Getty Images.

Fluor got mopped

Let's begin with Fluor's Q1 2018 earnings news, which came out last Thursday.

Fluor reported a $0.13-per-share loss for its fiscal first quarter, a big comedown from the $0.43-per-share profit it had earned one year prior. Fluor blamed the loss on a $0.69-per-share charge to earnings taken to account "for forecast revisions on a gas-fired power project." CEO David Seaton said, "Results for the quarter did not meet our expectations as a result of continued challenges on a gas-fired power project." If not for that charge, Fluor would have earned a profit, and earnings would have been $0.56 per share.

But here's the thing: Even without that charge, Fluor's earnings would have fallen short of the $0.77 per share in profit that Wall Street was looking for. Worse, Fluor cut its guidance for full-year profits by much more than the gas-fired misfire would appear to necessitate. Indeed, Fluor cut guidance by a full dollar, to a new range of $2.10 to $2.50.

Given this one-two punch of bad news, Fluor's sell-off last week appears justified.

Merrill Lynch unfazed

And yet, if you ask Merrill Lynch, Fluor's sell-off has the silver lining of providing new investors a much more attractive entry price into the stock. What's more, Merrill Lynch thinks you should enter Fluor today, upgrading the shares to buy.


From what it's seeing in the "capex cycle," construction firms like Fluor that cater to the energy and mining industries are in the "early innings" of a cyclical recovery, explains Merrill Lynch in a note today on It believes that energy and mining companies have underinvested in capital equipment over the past few years, and the analyst predicts a recovery in capex spending among Fluor's customers in H2 this year (hint: H2 begins in less than two months). The banker even goes so far as to say that Fluor's energy and mining profits could "double."

Merrill's advice therefore is to get ahead of the trend and buy Fluor today, because this stock is going to $58 a share within a year.

Does that make sense?

Energy and mining are big parts of Fluor's business. Along with one additional business in the company's flagship energy, chemicals, and mining segment, they accounted for nearly half the company's revenue last year, and for as much as two-thirds of annual revenue over the last three years, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence.

On the one hand, this data supports Merrill Lynch's thesis that Fluor customers have been underspending on capital investment "over the past few years." At the same time, it suggests that Fluor's results could indeed improve dramatically in the event capital spending in energy and mining goes up. What's more, the analyst's optimism about a recovery in these markets makes sense, given what we've seen happening in commodities pricing.

In energy alone, for example, we've seen the price of oil crater below $30 a barrel in early 2016, only to more than double over the next two years. (WTI crude is currently trading for close to $70 a barrel.) It makes sense that, with oil now more profitable to extract, Fluor's oil industry customers would ramp up their capital spending this year to take advantage of the more attractive prices their product can now command -- and this would be good news for Fluor.

What it means to investors

Fluor looks well-positioned to capitalize on this trend itself. The company's balance sheet, while not exactly debt-free, is at least net debt-free. Fluor has roughly $200 million more in cash on hand than it has debt on its books, leaving it in a net cash position on the balance sheet.

On the other hand, thanks in part to last week's bad news, Fluor is currently generating negative free cash flow, which means its cash surplus could evaporate if Merrill Lynch's predicted turnaround in industry capex spending doesn't materialize pretty darn quick.

So far, things aren't looking great on this front. In last week's update, Fluor noted that while it took in $4.8 billion in revenue in Q1, it won only $2.5 billion in new contracts to replace that revenue. The company's backlog of work to perform continued shrinking, and now stands at just $29.1 billion, down 30% from one year ago.

Merrill seems to think this situation will improve over the next few months, and if it's right, Fluor stock could turn around in a hurry. As for me, I'll be watching like a hawk. When I first recommended Fluor shares on Motley Fool CAPS last year, copious free cash flow was a big part of my personal buy thesis.

Despite Merrill Lynch's endorsement, now that FCF has disappeared, I'm giving serious thought to changing my CAPScall and giving Fluor a thumbs-down instead.

Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Fluor Corporation Stock Quote
Fluor Corporation
$24.89 (1.84%) $0.45

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/30/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.