Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Snap Stock Upgraded: What You Need to Know

By Rich Smith - Updated Apr 18, 2019 at 5:01PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Citi bases an upgrade on what appears, on its face, an outrageous claim.

Every day, Wall Street analysts upgrade some stocks, downgrade others, and "initiate coverage" on a few more. But do these analysts even know what they're talking about? Today, we're taking one high-profile Wall Street pick and putting it under the microscope...

Less than a week after Jefferies & Co. expressed doubts about the ability of Snap (SNAP 2.79%) to grow its business in an environment of "greater uncertainty around the global advertising picture," another analyst is weighing in with a somewhat more positive assessment of Snap. This morning, megabanker Citigroup announced it is removing its sell rating from Snap, and upgrading shares of the Snapchat owner to neutral instead.

Here's what you need to know.

Three panels showing group calling interface on Snapchat

Image source: Snap.

Five reasons to think Snap is worth $7

Like Jefferies did last week, Citigroup assigns Snap stock a $7 price target, as noted in a report today on StreetInsider.com (subscription required) -- about 10% more than what Snap trades for today. Citi cites five main reasons for its optimism:

  • Snapchat will be rolling out a new version of its app for Android phones, and Citi thinks the redesign could "improve user/engagement growth."
  • Average revenue per user (ARPU) growth accelerated in Q3 2018. The improvement was only modest -- up from 34% year-over-year growth in the first and second quarters of 2018, to 37% in Q3. Still, it was an improvement.
  • At the same time, Snap's spending has moderated in recent quarters, which should make profitability easier to come by if this trend continues in Q4 and beyond. Operating costs at Snap declined 11% in Q2 and fell 14% in Q3, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence.
  • Meanwhile, in contrast to Jefferies' generally downbeat assessment on the state of the online advertising market last week, Citi says it's hearing "generally optimistic comments from advertisers and agencies regarding [Snapchat's] platform outlook."

And here's the kicker: According to Citi, Snapchat stock now sells for a valuation that is "below that of Twitter and Facebook."

Say what?

That's obviously the comment I want to focus on today, because on the face of it, it's the one argument Citi makes that seems so blatantly wrong.

According to Citi, Snapchat's owner is a cheaper stock than either Twitter (TWTR 0.74%) or Facebook (META 1.30%). And yet, both Twitter and Facebook are profitable companies. Each has reported both positive GAAP net income and positive free cash flow over the past 12 months. Snap, on the other hand, has neither net income nor free cash flow on which to base a valuation.

It would seem seem impossible, therefore, for Citi to claim Snap is valued "below" the valuations of Twitter and Facebook. (After all, if you don't have any E, it's very hard to have a P/E -- much less a cheaper P/E than Twitter or Facebook.) Therefore, Citi must be talking about some other kind of valuation here.

My guess: Citi is comparing Snap, Twitter, and Facebook based on their multiples to sales, rather than to earnings or free cash flow. And on this point, the analyst is right. At 7.6 times trailing sales, Snap stock does actually cost a bit less than Twitter (8.6 times sales) and Facebook (eight times sales).

A distinction without a difference

And yet, while Citigroup might be technically correct here, I'm not sure it should make much difference to investors. The purpose of a for-profit business, after all, isn't just to rack up a lot of sales -- but to earn profits on those sales. Unless and until Snap figures out a way to earn a profit from its business, therefore, it probably shouldn't make much difference to investors what price-to-sales ratio the company sells for.

Simply put: If it's not earning profits, Snap is not, in fact, cheaper than companies that are. That's why, if you ask me, investors are much better off considering a purchase of Facebook stock at less than 22 times earnings, or even Twitter stock at 24 times earnings, than Snap.

Check out the latest Snap earnings call transcript.

Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Facebook and Twitter. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Snap Inc. Stock Quote
Snap Inc.
SNAP
$11.42 (2.79%) $0.31
Meta Platforms, Inc. Stock Quote
Meta Platforms, Inc.
META
$179.80 (1.30%) $2.31
Twitter, Inc. Stock Quote
Twitter, Inc.
TWTR
$44.27 (0.74%) $0.33

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
389%
 
S&P 500 Returns
125%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/12/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.