Reality was a lot less dramatic than what many high-profile Bitcoin (BTC +0.09%) investors hoped for this year. Its price spiked to a record high of more than $126,000 in early October, but then slumped back toward the low $90,000s after the Oct. 10 flash crash, giving back all of its gains for the year. That left many investors' price targets looking absurdly high in retrospect.
But what were people actually predicting, why did those numbers seem plausible at the time, and what should you take away from the gap between narrative and outcome here? Let's dig in and hash it out.
Image source: Getty Images.
How the forecasts stacked up
Let's take a quick look at Bitcoin price predictions from some of the top investors, asset managers, and crypto industry figures, as shown in the table below.
| Forecaster | Timeframe and price target for Bitcoin |
|---|---|
| JPMorgan | ~$165,000 by the end of 2025 |
| VanEck | ~$180,000 during 2025 |
| Standard Chartered | ~$200,000 to $250,000 by year-end 2025 |
| Robert Kiyosaki | ~$250,000 by the end of 2026 |
| Larry Fink | ~$500,000 to $700,000 over a long period of time |
| Chamath Palihapitiya | ~$500,000 by October 2025 |
| Michael Saylor | ~$150,000 before 2026 |
| Cathie Wood | ~$300,000 to ~$1.5 million by 2030 |
There are two things to notice right away.
First, not all of these were literal end-of-2025 calls, which matters because it means that some of the predictions could still be proven true in due time. Some are talking about late-decade regimes where Bitcoin prices soar to be more than $1 million, whereas BlackRock Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink is describing a hypothetical world where sovereign wealth funds actually shift between 2% and 5% of their vast holdings into Bitcoin.
Second, the drivers behind the forecasts were broadly the same. Many cited the 2024 halving as a catalyst for slower supply growth, which would in turn support higher prices. Likewise, some argued that inflows into U.S. Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) would send the coin much higher, and the same goes for inflows into corporate balance sheets and potentially sovereign wealth funds. Another common theme was the existence of an unstable macroeconomic environment where investors would want non-fiat currency-denominated assets outside any single government's control.

CRYPTO: BTC
Key Data Points
Using that logic, the more ambitious forecasts weren't completely ridiculous. They probably were just too aggressive on the timing. For the record, my price target for Bitcoin this year was about $175,000.
What went wrong
If you were to replay 2025 without the shocks stemming from tariffs, war, stubbornly high inflation, the Oct. 10 crypto flash crash, and an increasingly dysfunctional yet still advancing U.S. economy, Bitcoin probably ends the year much closer to the middle of the figures in that forecast table.
The ETFs registered billions of dollars in net inflows, corporate balance sheets continued accumulating Bitcoin, some sovereigns were loading up and others were advancing with their strategic reserve policies, and the halving's supply squeeze was as structurally important as it ever is. But 2025 delivered a sequence of headwinds that were strong enough to cap the rally.
To be blunt, the vast majority of market participants did not see any of those problems coming. Nor did they factor in how crypto was essentially in direct competition with other types of risk assets like artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, which largely stole the spotlight (and the capital inflows) this year.
For investors with a long-term horizon, one of the lessons here is that annual price targets are basically just for entertainment. They help reveal what assumptions some of the well-informed players are making about supply, adoption, and macro conditions, but they aren't something to anchor portfolio decisions on. Remember that a lot of the time, the people who propose a price target are talking their book. They need you to believe that prices will be higher, so that you buy the asset and bid the price of their investment up.
So what's the best move to position for Bitcoin's trajectory in 2026?
In my view, it's to continue to accumulate more Bitcoin via dollar-cost averaging (DCAing). With regularly scheduled purchasing and enough patience, it doesn't really matter what the coin does next year, as the odds are good that it will be higher than that 10 years from now. Once you have that perspective, it tends to make the yearly price targets start to seem a whole lot more arbitrary.





